Share

MPs support charity e-petition in Commons debate

MPs support charity e-petition in Commons debate
News

MPs support charity e-petition in Commons debate

Governance | Kirsty Weakley | 12 Jul 2012

Backbench MPs supported a motion calling on the government to review the issue of air ambulance services paying VAT on fuel during a debate in the House of Commons yesterday.

The debate was triggered by an e-petition, started by a member of the public, calling for a refund of VAT payments, which attracted more than 100,000 signatures – the number needed to be eligible for debate in the Commons. As MPs debated the issue last night the petition reached 150,000 signatures.

The motion was introduced by the Conservative MP for Hexham, Guy Opperman who asked the House of Commons to call on government to conduct an urgent published review of the situation in the next 12 months. He also asked that government considers providing grants to the air ambulance service to cover the cost of VAT on the fuel they purchase, again within the next 12 months.

Opperman compared the air ambulances to the lifeboat service, which is exempt from the EU directive and does not pay VAT on marine diesel. But when that exemption was put in place in 1977 the air ambulance service did not exist.

Opperman said: “Today I will ask the House to accept one basic principle: that there is no real difference between a lifeboat and a helicopter."

He added: “They are both, I suggest, providers of life-saving emergency services that deserve all our support and all the exemptions made available for their vital work so that they may continue.”

He claimed that the cost to the Treasury would be, “considerably less than £200,000 a year”.

Hugh Bayley, the Labour MP for York Central, whose constituent, Ken Sharpe, started the campaign, told MPs that the Labour MEP for Yorkshire and the Humber, Linda McAvan, recently asked the EU Parliament about the issue and was told: “Member States are free to address the problem of unrecoverable VAT by the introduction of so-called compensation schemes.”

Bayley argued that the government should agree to the request because “the proposal has captured the public imagination”. The petition reached the milestone of 100,000 signatures in a record 39 days.

He added that his “advice to members of the public who support the cause is: do not let up the pressure and keep reminding the government that the issue will not go away”.

Government response

Financial Secretary to the Treasury, Mark Hoban, said the government appreciated the work of air ambulance charities.

But he said that comparing helicopters to lifeboats was inaccurate as the RNLI exemption relates to international transport, not its life-saving services, and that a change in EU law would be necessary to create an exemption.

On the subject of a review, he said that there were already two reviews underway - one into the capability and funding of emergency services in London following the coroner’s report into the 7 July bombings, and another into the tax position of healthcare charities.

Hoban said: “I therefore suggest that, rather than having a separate, Treasury-led review, the most efficient way forward is for the existing engagement to continue, and for the Department of Health and the Treasury to work collaboratively to consider the tax impacts of different funding models as part of the wider work already in hand.”

He said the two departments were working closely together but “if it is ultimately not covered, the Treasury will carry out its own review” and agreed that it was “possible in principle to introduce a refund system”.

 

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

Free eNews

Charity Commission won't take action against Society Network Foundation

17 Oct 2014

The Charity Commission will take no action against the trustees of Society Network Foundation, even though...

Charity Retail Association appoints new chief executive

16 Oct 2014

The Charity Retail Association has appointed Martin Blackwell, who is currently chief executive of the...

Charity Commission and OSCR open search for new Sorp Committee members

16 Oct 2014

The Charity Commission and Office of the Scottish Charity Regulator launched a search today for new members...

Charities 'must continue to fight for the right to influence policy'

20 Oct 2014

Civil society organisations must not give up the fight to influence policy and governments, the international...

Charity criticised after refusing to pay Ashya King’s parents' legal fees

17 Oct 2014

Kids 'n' Cancer UK has been criticised for saying it will not pay the legal fees of the family of Ashya...

Blackbaud launches online giving platform for individual fundraisers

17 Oct 2014

Blackbaud has launched its online giving platform, everydayhero, for fundraisers in the UK in a bid to...

Blackbaud launches online giving platform for individual fundraisers

17 Oct 2014

Blackbaud has launched its online giving platform, everydayhero, for fundraisers in the UK in a bid to...

Don't dismiss social media 'slacktivists', fundraisers told at IFC

16 Oct 2014

Charities should embrace and love charity ‘slacktivists’ because social is a great ramp for new donors,...

Nesta has made no grants to charities from its Impact Investments Fund

16 Oct 2014

Only 15 per cent of applications to a Nesta fund to invest in innovations to help older people, children...

Join the discussion

Twitter
 
Training

Attending our one day courses is a highly effective way of ensuring new and existing trustees fully understand their role, responsibilities and liabilities.

>> Find out more <<