Share

Sketch: Dame Suzi's farewell to Parliament

Dame Suzi Leather, outgoing chair of the Charity Commission, courtesy of Andy Miah
News

Sketch: Dame Suzi's farewell to Parliament

Governance | Vibeka Mair | 4 Jul 2012

MPs at yesterday's public adminstration committee hearing with outgoing chair Dame Suzi Leather hinted that the next chair of the Charity Commission will have to be politically neutral. Vibeka Mair reports.

Dame Suzi Leather, outgoing chair of the Charity Commission, made her valedictory appearance before the public administration select committee (PASC) yesterday. Old wounds such as her perceived attack on private schools and political bias were reopened, but despite the  differences between MPs and Dame Suzi, it was rather a warm goodbye to the sector’s reputed “quango queen”.

Dame Suzi Leather’s role as the second chair of the Charity Commission has been never short of controversy, eliciting severe press and political critique, ranging from accusations of left-wing conspiracies to destroy the private school sector, to fashion-related attacks for her daring to wear a short skirt at some point in her life.

Her open membership of the Labour Party (but not her sartorial choices) was a main point of discussion at the PASC meeting yesterday – with committee chair Bernard Jenkins even suggesting that Dame Suzi’s successor at the Charity Commission may have to be politically neutral in the role.

Jenkins asked Dame Suzi: “Should we advise your potential successor against membership of a political party?”

“You should choose who is best for the job,” she insisted. “And anyone in public office should be open about party membership. It is an odd notion that one cannot be impartial and a member of a mainstream political party.”

Dame Suzi’s open (but not active) membership of the Labour Party was revisited often by different select committee MPs, clearly keen to tease out some admission that her political persuasion negatively affected, and even harmed, her position at the Charity Commission.

'Personalised attacks did not affect me'

But Dame Suzi remained resolute: “It’s true that the issue of charitable status and independent schools is an issue heavily ideologically laden in the public debate,” she said at one point. “And there is the instinct of the British media to personalise issues.

“Put that together it didn’t matter who was chair. They would have had a pretty tough job with the Charities Act 2006. It was a shame about the personalised attacks.

“But if you don’t expect to get some press comment in public office you are being naïve. They did not affect me but they were a slur on the independence of the Charity Commission.”

Throughout the hearing the independence of the  Commission was questioned, with Tory MPs Bernard Jenkins and Robert Halfon hinting that the Commission had been instructed by the previous Labour government to produce contentious guidance on public benefit - which has been successfully legally challenged by the independent schools sector which felt it threatened schools' charitable status.

Public benefit: successes and regrets

MPs focused on the recent tribunal hearing between the Charity Commission and the Independent Schools Council (ISC), which Dame Suzi admitted had cost the Commission £185,000 in legal costs.

“It did awfully look like a go at the independent schools sector,” said Jenkins. “Why a confrontation? Why just not withdraw the guidance?”

Dame Suzi noted that other fee-charging sectors such as care homes did not take issue with its public benefit guidance, which gave a view on how fee-charging charities could ensure they were indeed wholly charitable.

“The tribunal upheld most of our guidance,” Dame Suzi noted. “The only thing wrong was our reasonableness test.”

She did however admit that in retrospect the Commission should have looked at public benefit through partnerships with regards to the independent school sector:

“Our focus on bursaries made it seem like we were only interested in bursaries. This is a regret.”

Her conclusion appeared to be that Parliament had created the law, but shied away from clarifying it concretely. “It’s up to Parliament to give some definition of public benefit,” she said. “The ball was in their court.”

Courage and public service

Elsewhere, throughout the hearing Dame Suzi was clear to stress her concerns about the future of the Charity Commission with regards to funding. “If there are further cuts to our budget my successor won’t be able to carry out our statutory functions and could have to make some invidious choices. It’s not a good time to take over at the Commission.”

The hearing had started with support from Labour MP Paul Flynn who noted that the “unfair and untrue” reporting on the motives and work of the Charity Commission could have been a reason for its “savage cuts” of 33 per cent to its budget over the next couple of years. 

And it ended on a similar conciliatory note, with Bernard Jenkins paying tribute to Dame Suzi: “There has been controversy,” he said. “But there has never been a lack of courage and tremendous public service.”

 

 

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

Free eNews

Nandy demands PM inquiry into Big Society Network grants

24 Jul 2014

Lisa Nandy, the shadow minister for civil society, has written to David Cameron demanding an inquiry into...

Nesta: ‘We were not forced to fund Big Society Network’

24 Jul 2014

Nesta has denied a claim by a former board member that it was “forced” to provide start-up funding...

Barnardo's launches retail gift aid appeal

23 Jul 2014

Barnardo’s has launched an appeal to raise awareness of retail gift aid and the extra £6.5m that could...

Nandy demands PM inquiry into Big Society Network grants

24 Jul 2014

Lisa Nandy, the shadow minister for civil society, has written to David Cameron demanding an inquiry into...

Unicef raises £3.1m from Commonwealth Games opening ceremony appeal

24 Jul 2014

Unicef raised £3.1m through text and online donations from UK viewers watching the Commonwealth Games’...

People think charities spend just two-fifths of their income on 'the cause', research shows

24 Jul 2014

People think charities spend just 38 per cent of their income on ‘the cause’, but they believe organisations...

Greenpeace video removed from YouTube following copyright claim

14 Jul 2014

A campaign video by Greenpeace against Lego’s relationship with Shell has been subject to a copyright...

Oxfam advert removed after appearing before extremist videos

10 Jul 2014

Oxfam has removed one of its adverts from YouTube after it was shown on channels showing content from...

Data protection proposals 'potentially catastrophic' for fundraising

8 Jul 2014

EU data protection proposals could have a “potentially catastrophic” impact on charity fundraising,...

Join the discussion

Twitter
 
Training

Attending our one day courses is a highly effective way of ensuring new and existing trustees fully understand their role, responsibilities and liabilities.

>> Find out more <<