Cabinet Office considers appointing charity contracting rep

Cabinet Office considers appointing charity contracting rep

Cabinet Office considers appointing charity contracting rep3

Finance | Niki May Young | 17 May 2012

The Cabinet Office is looking at appointing a commissioning specialist to improve contracting relationships with the voluntary sector, Lord Wallace revealed at the Civil Society Question Time event yesterday.

Responding to a question from Su Sayer, chief executive of United Response, on whether small charities are being put off taking on contracts due to nervousness over payment-by-results (PBR), Lord Wallace (pictured) advised that Francis Maude has been looking at retraining government procurement staff to be more inclusive towards smaller local organisations:

“There is a large issue behind all of this, that is the way central government deals with very local organisations," he said. "One of the things that Francis Maude has been looking at is how you train people within central government who are giving contracts to think about how local it is, because they all think it is much more efficient to do it at a large-scale regional level,” he said.

He went on to say that the Cabinet Office is also looking at appointing “another Crown representative whose job will be specifically to look at the contracting relationship with the voluntary sector to make sure that others do not ignore that dimension”.

Defending the government’s approach to the PBR model, Liberal peer Lord Wallace, who is the Cabinet Office spokesman in the House of Lords, said the coalition was “learning as we go along with this and it’s a process with a lot of experimentation which is going to have to go on”.

However Sayer remained unconvinced, responding that: “It’s still very, very scary. And so, even though we are quite a large organisation with a lot of staff, we are only taking on very, very, very tiny contracts and if we are, I dread to think how scary it is for smaller organisations.”

Addressing barriers to payment-by-results

Panelists Lord Hodgson and NCVO chief Sir Stuart Etherington both identified cashflow as the main barrier for charities in the PBR model and mooted social investment as a solution. Hodgson, however, highlighted the bureaucratic barriers that will be faced in relying on this to improve matters for smaller charities:

“I think payment-by-results, unless done in consortia, may present a challenge to smaller charities,” said Hodgson. “There are of course opportunities if we are able to find ways to develop social investment and mixed-purpose investment which will require changes from the Ministry of Justice, and changes in the Financial Services Authority. It is quite a number of pieces on the chess board that need to be moved which could perhaps help smaller charities bridge that cashflow gap, but I think just straight off many charities will find it hard to do that because of the time between starting the work and getting paid for the results.”

Susanne Rauprich, chief executive of the National Council for Voluntary Youth Service, said that the public service delivery agenda and that of the Big Society "do not easily mix". She advised from the audience that there are many organisations which would not be able to embrace social finance options to get to the position that they could take part in PBR contracts but have a lot to offer in terms of finding solutions for their young beneficiaries.

"Unless we bridge the gap between the Big Society-type organisations and the public service contract-type organsations we will never find a solution," she said.

Recognition of risk

Lesley-Anne Alexander, chair of Acevo and chief executive of RNIB, said the panel was missing a key point in its discussion of PBR, that of risk-sharing.

"Charities work with the most marginalised communities," she said. "I don't know if any of you have ever tried to persuade an employer to get a blind person on their payroll - it's blooming difficult work," she said. "What we need in the contracting environment is the recognition of risk-sharing and not simply offloading risk on to what happens to be a very willing voluntary sector."





Lance Clarke
Unnamed charity
20 Dec 2012

Some time ago I spent time recording the views of others in my sector re the activities of councillors and their procurement departments - my conclusion is that there is an enormous muddle, fraught with competing agendas, now significantly worsened by the recessionary cost cutting. These factors, coupled with a general lack of proper procurement training in some councils has made life difficult; moreover, the thought that govt can restrain local council procurement officers is laughable, COMPACT is a case in point. I read about: opportunities, social investment and so on - Commissioners often pick up these buzz-words without a clue as to what they mean or how to properly introduce them, relying on them as they do as good sound-bites. We face call-off contracting for specialist services (a kind of PBR) and the notion that our charity should '50:50 risk-share'. There is no, and will be no effective ombudsman, there will be no restraint and many good charities will suffer. Contracts are not the right vehicles to innovate. As a footnote, if local councils could only be encouraged to talk with the Third Sector as partners. Then, together, we could work towards innovative solutions that deliver services, to more people and at less cost, rather than spending money on wasteful bureaucracy. This is a late post and will probably not even get looked at.

Hilary Barnard
Principal Consultant
17 May 2012

It is very strange that Lord Wallace thinks he can fob a third sector audience with a statement that the coalition government is “learning as we go along with this [payment by results] and it’s a process with a lot of experimentation which is going to have to go on”.
Is he suggesting that Ministers are slow learners when confronted with evidence of all the problems being thrown up by payment by results for small and medium sized third sector organisations?
Why should the experiment continue in its present form once the evidence is confronted?

Carl Allen
18 May 2012
Response to [Hilary Barnard]

It is more than time for the charity sector to accept and properly respond to what the historical evidence shows i.e. government ministers have SEN needs (SEN being special education needs).


[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear


  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

Free eNews

Children's centre numbers fell by 800 after almost £500m of cuts, says Barnardo's

22 May 2015

Almost a quarter of children’s centres across the UK have been forced to close or merge as a result...

Sexual abuse charity to close after being overwhelmed with inquiries

21 May 2015

A child sexual abuse charity is set to close after it was overwhelmed with inquiries following the publicity...

Charities are being driven out of business by pension schemes, CFG tells DWP

20 May 2015

Skills for Logistics, a sector skills council charity, was driven into liquidation by its pension scheme...

Oxfam GB appoints new director to grow major donor fundraising

22 May 2015

Oxfam GB has appointed a new director in a bid to grow income from what it called “high value” partnerships....

DEC appeal raises £65m in under a month for Nepal quake

22 May 2015

The Disasters Emergency Committee’s Nepal Earthquake Appeal has raised £65m since it opened for donations...

Olive Cooke investigation ‘likely to lead to tighter rules on direct mail and telephone fundraising’

21 May 2015

The Fundraising Standards Board will investigate how charities share lists of donors and whether opt-out...

Marie Curie grows visitor time and donor numbers online by a quarter after digital relaunch

22 May 2015

Marie Curie set out to improve its use of digital after realising that it was “limiting its future”...

Amnesty trials virtual reality headsets for street fundraisers

21 May 2015

Amnesty International UK has given street fundraisers virtual reality headsets so they can show the public...

Review programme launched to help charity sector embrace digital technology

20 May 2015

A review programme has been launched by think tank NPC to assess how to improve access to digital technology...

Join the discussion


Attending our one day courses is a highly effective way of ensuring new and existing trustees fully understand their role, responsibilities and liabilities.

>> Find out more <<