Regulator commissions research into public benefit perceptions

Governance | Tania Mason | 25 Jan 2012

The Charity Commission has instructed researchers to study perceptions amongst charities of the impact of the public benefit requirement.

The research will be led by Leila Baker and Professor Margaret Harris from the Institute for Voluntary Action Research (IVAR) and supported by Professor Gareth Morgan at Sheffield Hallam University.

The research will “analyse perceptions, knowledge and experience of the impact on charities of the renewed emphasis on the public benefit requirement in the Charities Act 2006”.

It will inform future policy work by the Charity Commission and will also feed into Lord Hodgson’s statutory review of the Charities Act 2006.

It is the third research project commissioned by the regulator around public benefit, and aims to investigate what impact the requirement has been in practice. The researchers will conduct interviews with individuals from the sector and host workshops with a range of representatives.

The study began this month and will end in April.

Professor Gareth Morgan (pictured) said: “The concept of public benefit has created massive debate and the process of reforming the requirements, which led to the Charities Act 2006, has been one of the central issues affecting charities over the last 20 years.

"This study will offer a key opportunity to link the legal issues with the practical experience of leading people in the sector, including charity trustees and professional advisers.”

In 2011 Sheffield Hallam’s Centre for Voluntary Sector Research carried out a major study for the Commission on public benefit reporting in the trustees’ reports of charities. The full report can be read here.

Directory: Sheffield Hallam University
Who's Who: Gareth Morgan

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Name *

Email *

Organisation

Job Title

Comments *

Verification *

* Please read our Community Standards

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

Robust but respectful debate
Strongly held opinions
Intelligent relevant discussion
The sharing of relevant experiences
New participants

We will not publish:

Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
The posting of contact details for yourself or others
Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.