Share

Major deterrents to contacting charities revealed

Major deterrents to contacting charities revealed
News

Major deterrents to contacting charities revealed 2

Governance | Niki May Young | 27 Oct 2011

People are put off contacting a charity for support or advice if a charity is hard to contact, takes a long time to respond or asks for too much personal information, according to research by Connect Assist.

Connect Assist, which runs professional helplines for the not-for-profit sector, conducted a survey of 1,000 people throughout the UK to determine what factors encourage and discourage people from contacting charities. The results showed that 58 per cent would be discouraged from seeking advice if the charity was hard to contact, increasing to 65 per cent for over 55-year-olds.

Being 'put on hold' was almost as big a deterrent, with 57 per cent saying a long waiting time would prevent them contacting a charity. Half of respondents also agreed that giving out a lot of personal information would be a deterrent, while 31 per cent agreed that staying anonymous was important.

Jane van Zyl, head of operations at Samaritans, which offers an extensively-used helpline for people in distress, said: "It’s incredibly important that research like this is done to ensure charities are available to support as many people as possible in the right way. We receive 2.8 million calls a year, so it’s essential that people can get through and don’t get an engaged tone. Most calls to our helpline are between 10pm and 2am, so we work to ensure that more volunteers are manning the phone during this period.

“By being confidential we know that callers feel more able to talk through their problems. It’s also vital that people can access support in a variety of ways, which is why Samaritans can be contacted through phone calls, emails, texts, letters and face-to-face.”

Reasons for contacting a charity

Ten per cent of people surveyed had contacted a charity in the past 12 months for help, support or advice, with the highest demographic being 45 to 54-year-olds at 16 per cent, compared to just 7 per cent of 18 to 24-year-olds. The results also varied geographically with just 6 per cent of Scots admitting contact with a charity, compared to 11 per cent in the South East and Midlands, 8 per cent in the North, and 12 per cent in Wales and the South West. 

The greatest reason for contacting a charity was for a health and/or medical issue, with 36 per cent contacting for this reason. The next highest, 19 per cent, used a charity for help support or advice on an emotional and/or stressful issue. Just 4 per cent contacted for a marriage and/or personal relationship issue. 

Some 41 per cent of respondents said that being available 24/7 was important for people needing to contact a charity. But the most important thing was talking to a sympathetic person who listens and provides advice, with 53 per cent agreeing to this.

Other important factors included quick and easy access to information (39 per cent), speed of response (34 per cent), a variety of ways to access information or support (32 per cent) and staying anonymous (31 per cent).

Just 17 per cent agreed that meeting face-to-face with a charity was important, while 26 per cent said it would deter them from seeking help, support or advice from a charity.

Using social media to provide support

A total of 26 per cent of respondents said that they were likely to consider accessing information from a charity via social media such as Facebook and Twitter. This varied evenly going up the age scale from 58 per cent of 18 to 24-year-olds advising they were fairly or very likely to contact a charity this way, compared to just six per cent of over-65-year-olds. (See graph at foot of page)

The survey also dipped into the effects of the funding cuts. Some 82 per cent of respondents feeling that it is important that charities provide the same level of service in light of funding cuts, with 37 per cent saying it is very important, and 45 per cent saying it is fairly important. Nine per cent said it was not important at all while a further 9 per cent did not know. 

 

 

Martha
2 Nov 2011

I think that what people want when they contat a charity will depend dramatically on what type of advice they are looking for.

Some things people will want to deal with by phone and online because relative anonymity is valued. In other areas for example debt and legal advice they want face to face advice more than anything so that someone else will be there to open all those envelopes they've been ignoring or read the documents that they've been sent.

Face to face advice is often the only way that the most vulnerable people will take advice from a charity but even here inaccessibility, limited opening hours or an awkward location will be very offputting.

Finally, I would suggest that charities are no worse than businesses of equivalent size in terms of professionalism. There are lots of very small charities and like small businesses professionalism and training in 'customer service' varies wildly.

Barbara
27 Oct 2011

Very interesting study. Mainly because it's from users' perspective and charities seem to avoid this particular perspective...

It would be great to read something about accessibility of all services provided by the sector - although I work in a charity myself and I'm genuinely enthusiastic to shout about how great the sector is (I work in CVS, shouting about the greatness is part of my job), I don't have even one positive experience with services.

Either never open or nobody responds to emails and phones or people were so unprofessional I was simply scared. And I don't know even 1 charity person (staff member) who uses the sector's services. Anybody having any experiences?

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

emailalert

Tribunal upholds Commission's merger decision but orders changes

24 May 2012

The Charity Tribunal has upheld the Charity Commission’s decision to allow two independent schools in...

Tender is issued for £200m National Citizen Service contracts

24 May 2012

The Department for Education has issued an invitation to tender for delivery of the National Citizen Service...

Trustees 'should be free to seek total return investments without approval'

24 May 2012

The Charity Law Association has recommended trustees are given the legal freedom to invest on a total...

Philanthropy in higher education consultation looks at collaboration with wider charity sector

25 May 2012

The Higher Education Funding Council for England has hinted at the possibility of collaboration with the...

Esmée Fairbairn: applications to trusts and foundations remain stable

25 May 2012

The Esmée Fairbairn Foundation is surprised not to have been inundated with applications for funding...

Charities in Twitter storm over balloon releases

24 May 2012

Charities are being urged to abandon balloon releases in a Twitter a campaign.

Charities express concerns over cookie compliance

25 May 2012

From tomorrow the Information Commissioner’s Office will enforce the law requiring all websites to inform...

Charities in Twitter storm over balloon releases

24 May 2012

Charities are being urged to abandon balloon releases in a Twitter a campaign.

Missing People plans to use Twitter to find child runaways

24 May 2012

Missing People is hoping to track down missing children using Twitter.

Join the discussion

Twitter
 
Training

Attending our one day courses is a highly effective way of ensuring new and existing trustees fully understand their role, responsibilities and liabilities.

>> Find out more <<