Adopt prevention agenda to save money, SCVO tells government

Governance | Tania Mason | 7 Sep 2011

The Scottish Council for Voluntary Organisations is urging the Scottish government and Parliament to embrace an agenda of preventing social problems from occurring rather than trying to fix them once they’ve happened.

The SCVO claims that a prevention agenda is the “only option to reduce public spending and choke off demand for expensive services the country can’t now afford”.

The body has made the submission in its response to the Scottish Parliament’s Finance Committee Consultation on Preventative Spending. It advises that a new system should be devised that incentivises public sector investment in preventative services, and that this requires a targeted approach that draws on the experience and expertise of the voluntary sector.

SCVO has singled out three causes that it believes the government should allocate funding to in the first instance: elderly care, re-offending and early years.

Martin Sime (pictured), chief executive of SCVO, said: “While we can’t expect a wholesale move to prevention approaches right away we recommend that the Scottish government initially focuses on allocating prevention funding to these three key areas where the best impact can be made the most quickly.”

The organisation also recommends a new fund to measure the impact of preventative projects implemented by sector groups, examination of how to remove barriers to the scaling up of successful projects, and a focus on “demand management to choke off current and future demand on services”.

SCVO also attached an annex to its submission outlining examples of existing sector projects that deliver savings to the public purse, along with advice on how they might be expanded and where the government should invest to have the biggest impact through preventative services.

Directory: SCVO
Who's Who: Martin Sime

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Name *

Email *

Organisation

Job Title

Comments *

Verification *

* Please read our Community Standards

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

Robust but respectful debate
Strongly held opinions
Intelligent relevant discussion
The sharing of relevant experiences
New participants

We will not publish:

Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
The posting of contact details for yourself or others
Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.