Yesterday, I went to the meeting of a coalition of small charities who are working together to tackle a public health problem that affects communities right across the UK. The issues discussed were pertinent, the commitment evident, and the collegiality obvious. The day began with the presentation of a set of research findings which highlighted the importance (both practically and strategically) of collaboration - surely an excellent endorsement of the meeting itself.

Later in the day, something came from leftfield that knocked me for six (how’s that for a sporting mixed metaphor!). The talk of collaboration and the predicted reduction in central government funding had attendees talking of how some charities "will have to close” and how some “will need to merge”.     

Mergers and closures are no fait accompli in the event of a change of government or government policy. Charities that work smart, work hard and work strategically needn’t be a victim of the political or economic climate. Admittedly, there are times when the pooling of operations are the best solution for an organisation, its staff and beneficiaries; but if a charity has the support of its beneficiaries, staff and board then the future should be bright.   

Ever the optimist, I like to believe that the doors of our charities should only close with the achievement of our missions.  

Am I dreaming? Are mergers and closures our new reality? Do we exist to keep ourselves in business?