Share

Website review: www.norwood.org.uk

Website review: www.norwood.org.uk
Reviews

Website review: www.norwood.org.uk

IT | Mrudula Kodali | 4 Aug 2010

Web expert Mrudula Kodali runs the rule over the website of learning disabilities charity Norwood.

The changing images on the homepage draw attention effectively. But there’s no ability to control the image changes. The site visitor is in the dark as to how many images there are in total or indeed how to go back or forward a picture. Implementing a carousel would work well here, setting expectations and handing site visitors control.

The news ticker is easily missed, being so close to the powerful images. Similar to the imagery, the ticker also has no controls to pause, rewind or forward a story. BBC News has an excellent example of a controllable ticker.

It’s great to see the support helpline visible on every page at the top. There’s also a clear call-to-action to donate online, making it very easy for potential donors. However, the logo and search are positioned unconventionally. Search is traditionally expected at the top right and the logo top left, a mirror of Norwood’s implementation.

The main navigation labels are exemplary, being clear and posing exactly the questions a site visitor might have about the organisation and website. The teaser views of ‘what we do’ and ‘how you can help’ on the homepage provide the site visitor with key information as well as enhancing the site’s search engine optimisation (SEO).

However, the left hand navigation is lacking in usability. The text size is too small and the area doesn’t stand out as navigation, being on a white background.

While viewing options are available on the top left, it’s surprising that this only presents colour contrast choices. There’s a recognisable text resizing icon but no way to change the font size. Although text resizing is possible through browser controls, only advanced web users tend to be aware of this.

Video content is slow to load and starts playing automatically. Best practice is to offer visitors the option to play. A variety of factors such as bandwidth, appropriateness of the situation (eg in the middle of an office without headphones) can determine this choice.

Overall, the site has decent usability but mostly lacks in offering its visitors control. With some changes it could easily provide a superior user experience.

Score: 7/10

Mrudula Kodali is a senior consultant at Webcredible

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close ยป

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.