Transparency and the web

Transparency and the web

Transparency and the web

Governance | John Tate | 26 Mar 2009

John Tate says the web is a real danger to charities’ reputations.

Looking back on my personal work on charity boards a number of things stand out. Firstly, many charities do fantastic work and have made a real difference to countless  people’s lives. Secondly, their work has been made hugely more difficult at times by the extraordinary ineptitude of a number of their  stakeholders – in particular government funders. The mountains of paperwork, bureaucracy and lack of transparency  creates a huge amount of unnecessary work and pressure which works against, rather than for the charity sector.

Why isn’t something done? Maybe it is partly because the outside world does not know about this and hence the government-backed funders can ‘get away with it’?

Would greater transparency help the cause? In this context it is interesting to see how IT is driving the transparency agenda.The web continues to open up new sources of information – whether charities like it or not. One example appeared in a recent Plaza Publishing Charity News Alert, namely the website

This site is “a directory of those so-called charities that receive substantial funding from either the UK or EU governments”. This site is not untypical of what can come out of the blogging community. Pretty aggressive, opinionated and with some strong language. The site has been widely visited and is stir-ring up real media interest. Technorati, which tracks blog sites, shows a number of comments have been made about this site. This includes  members of the web community suggesting  further donations are not given to some high profile charities.

Examples of adverse coverage of charities are growing in webland. For example, here is an extract from a blog in March attacking the NSPCC:

“Everybody’s favourite fake charity, the NSPCC, has been taking a bit of a kicking at its Facebook site, with home educators, outraged by the NSPCC’s linking of HE with child abuse, giving full vent to their feelings about being slurred in this way. Rather than engage, the NSPCC has first denied doing anything wrong and has now tried to kill the debate by deleting the criticism in its entirety.” Not pretty reading and of course this is only one side of the story.

If there is any doubt over the increasing use of the web look no further than the Netbook.As covered last year a Netbook is a class of laptop computer designed for wireless  communication and access to the internet.

Costing aroud £200 plus VAT and primarily designed for web browsing and email-ing, Netbooks rely heavily on the internet for remote access to web-based applica-tions. IDC, a leading IT research company,  reported early this year that 3.6 million ‘mini notebooks’ were sold in the fourth quarter of 2008, representing 20 per cent of all PCs sold. So for many the web is now the main  environment that they work in.

Charities face an uphill struggle to gain public confidence. In a report published last year by the Brookings Institute in the US there were some worrying findings. These included:

“The considerable drop in the ratings of helping people poses a serious challenge to the sector’s distinctiveness as a destination for giving and volunteering. As of October 2003, 34 per cent of Americans said charita-ble organisations did ‘very good’ in helping people; in March 2008, only 25 per cent gave that same rating. This statistically significant drop is the most troubling finding in the sur-vey.” While this survey does not cover the UK, the position over here is not great either.

Charities need to have a clear strategy on how they engage with the web. Some post-ings are clearly not true – and these need to be refuted with care. Some are true and while unwelcome, need an honest and open response. Many are somewhere in the middle and the charity subject to the comment is in a challenging position to produce a response which is given credence by readers.Is this ‘transparency’ good for the sector? No, if it adversely affects the reputation of a genuinely world-class charity. Perhaps yes if this helps sort out some of the really disap-pointing things that are going on undercover, away from the public eye?


[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear


  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

Tuning in to technology

16 Feb 2015

John Tate is befuddled by the vast array of choice available when making a new technology investment....

Transparency is not the same as communication

6 Feb 2015

Research earlier this week found no top-100 charity had complied with all of NCVO's proposals on pay transparency....

Civil Society's 12 Days of Christmas

22 Dec 2014

In the lead-up to the Christmas break Civil Society News brought readers different festive feature, looking...

Banking blog: 5 big fat myths about borrowing when you’re a charity

24 Mar 2015

Azlina Bulmer, programmes and development manager at our banking partner Charity Bank, debunks the falsehoods...

How was the Budget for the voluntary sector?

19 Mar 2015

The final Budget of this Parliament contained some useful giveaways and legal changes, but did little...

Phelanthropic thoughts

10 Mar 2015

Like so many others in civil society, Ian Allsop has a great deal to thank Daniel Phelan for.

Free eNews