Share

CRUK is top charity social media brand

CRUK is top charity social media brand
News

CRUK is top charity social media brand

Fundraising | Kirsty Weakley | 30 May 2012

Cancer Research UK is the leading charity brand to feature in this year’s Social Brands 100 report for its use of social media.

It came in fourth in the overall league table, and 15 charities were included in the top 100 making the sector the second best represented. It was narrowly beaten by the travel and leisure industry, which has a 17 per cent share.

The analysis of brands’ use of social media was carried out by agency Headstream. Nominations were opened in January, and brands were nominated on Twitter using the hashtag #socialbrands100 and the account @socialbrands100.

More than 300 brands were nominated which were then assessed against 19 observable brand markers, designed to “measure the intensity of interactions between the brand and the individuals who make up the brand community”. They were assessed on their use of Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, Foursquare, Google+, and their own blogs or forums.

Each brand was then given a score out of 268.5 and the top 100 were then assessed by a panel of experts with a further 120 available.

Aaron Eccles, social media manager at Cancer Research UK said: “Social media is a vital way of helping us reach everyone who wants to engage with Cancer Research UK offering them new and exciting content from the latest developments in science to opportunities to get involved in campaigns to new ways to fundraise.”

The charity also topped a charity social 100 index that was carried out by Visceral Business last year. It has 250,000 Facebook fans and 40,000 Twitter followers.

Full list of charities featuring in the index:

Charity

 

Rank


Data Score

 

Panel Score

 

Social Brand Score

 

 Cancer Research UK

 

 4

 

 134

 

 101

 

 235

 

British Red Cross

 

 5

 

 129

 

 104

 

 233

 

 ARKive

 

 6

 

 145

 

 87

 

 232

 

 WWF

 

 17

 

 117

 

 99

 

 216

 

 DoSomething.org

 

 18

 

 125

 

 90

 

 215

 

 Help for Heroes

 

 19

 

 130

 

 83

 

 213

 

 RSPB

 

 23

 

 129

 

 83

 

 212

 

 National Trust

 

 24

 

 120

 

 90

 

 210

 

 NSPCC

 

 29

 

 115

 

 91

 

 206

 

MS Society 

 

 38

 

 110

 

 92

 

 202

 

British Heart Foundation

 

 39

 

 126

 

 75

 

 201

 

 Diabetes UK

 

 41

 

 116

 

83

 

 199

 

Marie Curie Cancer Care

 

 41

 

 119

 

 80

 

 199

 

RAF Benevolent Fund

 

 71

 

 117

 

 61

 

 178

 

 VisitWoods

 

 71

 

 112

 

 66

 

 178

 

 

 

 

Click here to see the full report.

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

Free eNews

Big Society Capital invests £10m to support charity bond growth

25 Jul 2014

Big Society Capital has announced a £10m Charity Bond Support Fund to encourage more charities into the...

HSBC to close bank account of Muslim charity working in Gaza

25 Jul 2014

HSBC has informed the Ummah Welfare Trust that it will close its bank accounts because the charity “now...

Nandy demands PM inquiry into Big Society Network grants

24 Jul 2014

Lisa Nandy, the shadow minister for civil society, has written to David Cameron demanding an inquiry into...

FRSB rejects complaint against the RSPB

25 Jul 2014

The Fundraising Standards Board has thrown out a complaint that the RSPB’s Abernethy Forest appeal made...

Culture, Media and Sport Committee launches inquiry into society lotteries

25 Jul 2014

The Culture, Media and Sport Select Committee has launched an inquiry into society lotteries that will...

Nandy demands PM inquiry into Big Society Network grants

24 Jul 2014

Lisa Nandy, the shadow minister for civil society, has written to David Cameron demanding an inquiry into...

Commission clarifies statements on staff attendance at board meetings

25 Jul 2014

The Charity Commission has rewritten its operational compliance report on the case of Southwark Muslim...

Nandy demands PM inquiry into Big Society Network grants

24 Jul 2014

Lisa Nandy, the shadow minister for civil society, has written to David Cameron demanding an inquiry into...

Workfare charities set to be named after Tribunal rules against DWP

23 Jul 2014

Charities that are involved in the workfare programme run by the Department for Work and Pensions look...

Join the discussion

Twitter button

@CivilSocietyIT