Charities need IT representation at board level, says Brenson

IT | Gareth Jones | 22 Nov 2010

The charity sector is “massively behind” the private sector in terms of having IT representation at board level, according to Andrew Brenson, head of IT at Save the Children.

Speaking at the Civil Society IT Conference last week, he said: “Tesco has just given the chief executive role to a bloke who was previously in charge of IT; that is the future.

“You show me any FTSE 100 company that doesn’t have an IT representative at board level. Apologies if it offends anyone in the room but the sector is massively behind; the fact that IT is controlled by accountants is mad.”

“Antithesis of best practice”

Brenson, who spent ten years at Channel Four before joining Save the Children five years ago, emphasised the importance of keeping an IT strategy and implementation simple.

Referring to Save the Children’s IT systems when he joined, he said: “It was the worst, it was the antithesis of best practice.

“Everything that could be wrong was wrong and I took two and a half years putting it right. In this sector you have to keep it simple, you should try not to deviate away from standards.”

He added: “We have no choice but to use Microsoft in this sector, because of the pricing structure and the complexities involved in open source.”

Second Life

Meanwhile, he warned charities to “beware bandwagons”. “There are a lot of fads that I’ve seen over time. Anyone remember Second Life?

“I think it’s still out there but it’s not as big as it used to be. Save the Children spent a lot of money on Second Life and I don’t think we made a lot of money out of it.”

Directory: Save the Children

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Name *

Email *

Organisation

Job Title

Comments *

Verification *

* Please read our Community Standards

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

Robust but respectful debate
Strongly held opinions
Intelligent relevant discussion
The sharing of relevant experiences
New participants

We will not publish:

Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
The posting of contact details for yourself or others
Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.