Technology is great but it's not a magic bullet

Technology is great but it's not a magic bullet

Technology is great but it's not a magic bullet

Fundraising | Kirsty Weakley | 9 Jul 2012

The launch of a new digital fundraising platform for arts and heritage organisations has made Kirsty Weakley think about how she wants to support them in the future. 

This might sound odd coming from an IT reporter and self-confessed gadget geek, but technology is not always the only solution. In fact I fear that organisations expecting any new online donation platform or app to be revolutionary may end up disappointed by the results.

Of course that’s not to say that there aren’t some really good examples of charities using new technologies in creative ways to raise money, but technology is not the be-all-and-end-all.

Last week saw the announcement of a new scheme to create a flexible, online, mobile digital fundraising platform for the arts, heritage and culture sector.

The National Funding Scheme aims to enable visitors to arts, cultural and heritage sites to donate using their mobile phone via SMS, credit card or through a dedicated app. It hopes to capitalise on people’s desire to support an organisation instantly, during visits, rather than waiting until they have got home.

Henry Makower, managing director of Panlogic, the digital agency that has come up with the scheme, predicts it could raise £8m for the sector in its first year and £18m in its second.

Makower plans to set up a charity to run the National Funding Scheme, and expects to start trialling it with some organisations by March 2013, with a full launch due in 2014. He needs to secure the £600,000 start-up funding by September to develop the system. From then on he expects the system to be self-funding by charging organisations 3 per cent of the donations to manage the admin costs. Organisations will also be able to purchase the data collected by the platform about people who have made donations to them.

He said: “The funding landscape is changing and, whilst there are still grants from the centre, arts organisations need to urgently reconsider all options to build for the future.”

And he’s right. Arts Council England cut funding to more than 200 organisations in 2011 and the organisation itself has had its budget reduced by 11.8 per cent over the next four years.

Unsurprisingly the culture secretary, Jeremy Hunt, who attended the launch event, is supportive of the project, describing it as “an example of a private sector initiative that understands the needs of the sector, and has the potential to encourage much wider giving as one of the ways to make the sector more sustainable”.

More praise for the project comes from Lord Smith of Finsbury, chairman of the Environment Agency, who described it as “an idea of genius” and has agreed to be the new charity’s patron.

This all sounds very appealing from a fundraiser's perspective – more donations, more data. But what about for the potential donor – will it really be easier to register and donate through this new platform than to pop a few coins into a collection box on the way out?

As a visitor I’m not convinced I would be keen to hand my details over to every organisation that asked me. I’m more than happy to give a cash donation as I leave, but like most people I already get too many emails and am reluctant to open myself up to more, even if there are opt-outs, especially if it’s somewhere I am unlikely to visit again.

Once the novelty of digital giving wears off, the public will start to be pickier about who gets their precious details. For example I would probably be happy to hear from Chelmsford Museum (my local one – refurbished a couple of years ago and well worth a visit if you’re in the area), but not from the Jorvik centre in York - again very good, but I’m not likely to visit again for at least ten years and do not really care about what they're up to.

Of course I hope this new platform is a success and does provide a new income stream for arts organisations.  But they should be wary of assuming that technology is the holy grail. Personally I’m a sucker for anyone dressed up in a silly outfit speaking in ye olde Englishe. It would be a shame if in a few years time there just signs asking us to click and donate and no eccentric volunteers giving the place character while asking for donations.



[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear


  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

Kirsty Weakley

Kirsty Weakley is a reporter at Civil Society Media.

Follow Kirsty on Twitter @KirstyWeakley 

Popular Tags

The long and unhappy saga of the Local Sustainability Fund

29 Jun 2015

Last week the government announced a £20m pot of funding for charities. This sounds like good news, says...

Government can't ask charities to compete for contracts while savaging council spending

15 Jun 2015

The government cannot tell charities they must compete for contracts in a market while slashing the spending...

'Northern Powerhouse'? Almost as clearly defined as the big society

4 Jun 2015

Ian Allsop talks tomatoes and why charities should look north for income growth opportunities under the...