Accelerating insurance change for volunteer drivers
25 May 2012
Dan Sumners outlines Volunteering England's efforts to turn insurance red tape into a green light for...
Charity PR specialist Ingrid Marson recommends you think hard about the implications before jumping into the social media beehive.
I was chatting to the manager of a small charity the other day, who is looking to redesign the charity's website. After chatting for a few minutes, he dropped in the words I'd been dreading: "We're thinking we need to make it interactive - perhaps have a forum and a blog."
I often hear this from charities. Whenever a website redesign is being planned, people often start thinking about incorporating interactive technologies, such as blogs, forums or member areas.
It's true that the internet is no longer purely about passively viewing content and that people want to interact with each other and generate their own content. However - for small charities at least - trying to incorporate Web 2.0 technologies into their website is likely to be a mistake, unless staff have plenty of time available to regularly write content and to put in the hard work of creating a community from scratch.
I remember from when I worked as a journalist at an online technology news site how hard it was to get people to comment on the stories we posted - despite posting dozens of stories daily, the majority never attracted comments, and those that did, got comments from the same limited set of readers. Shortly after I left the company, they hired a community manager whose full-time role was to focus on encouraging user-interaction.
Rather than creating your own forum and spending the time getting people to take part, why not set up a Facebook page? Many of your supporters, service users and volunteers will already spend large amounts of time on Facebook, so it will be less effort for them to sign up to and interact with your page. However, if you do create a Facebook page, make sure you promote it to your supporters (via your website, newsletter, email signature etc.) and regularly update it with new content.
Blogs are another thing that charities often think they should add to their website. Before adding a blog...
Rather than going down the blog route, why not try out Twitter? As posts are limited to 140 characters, it's less time consuming. You can use Twitter to post information about what you're working on a particular day, snippets of news about your charity, or links to interesting articles or websites you've found.
For more information about making the most out of Web 2.0 technologies, check out Acorn PR's Web 2.0 tutorial.
25 May 2012
Dan Sumners outlines Volunteering England's efforts to turn insurance red tape into a green light for...
21 May 2012
Community isn't led by government, so why wait for it to tell you what to do, protests Robert Ashton....
21 May 2012
How do you solve a problem like a pension deficit? David McHattie tackles the issue.
15 Oct 2012
15 Oct 2012
15 Oct 2012
19 Nov 2012
Geoff Sloan
administrator
safer london foundation
13 Jan 2011
Great advice for small charities - a forum with no posts makes you look less interesting than no forum at all.
It's hard to underestimate the time involved in keeping your website, Facebook, LinkedIn updated, let alone creating something worth reading (and your time writing) for a blog.
Best learning I had about social media was that if we wanted to target corporates our Facebook page just wasn't going to cut it. When I did the (now) obvious thing and created a LinkedIn presence (a group and a company page) and invited the same people I'd publicised our Facebook page to it got more than three times the members in a week than Facebook did in six months. Just gotta keep the discussion topics rolling...
[Reply]