Suffering from social media fatigue?

Suffering from social media fatigue?

Suffering from social media fatigue? 1

IT | Kirsty Weakley | 11 Nov 2011

Social networking is great for charities. Done well it creates a much deeper relationship between charities, supporters, volunteers and end-users. But is there really room for one more? Kirsty Weakley asks.

As a supporter I can ‘like’ the Facebook page to get access to exclusive content, ‘follow’ it on Twitter to keep up-to-date with the latest breaking news and can now add it to a ‘circle’ on Google+ to…I’m not sure what yet, but I have spent a good two hours setting up my profile and adding people and organisations (mostly those I already follow on either Facebook or Twitter).

Google+ opened up to organisations at the beginning of the week and unsurprisingly charities have been among the first to set up pages, posting updates and attracting followers.

But where does Google+ really fit into the social media landscape? And can it really offer charities something different in terms of communication and relationship-building? Facebook has got the ‘added value’ area covered and Twitter is great for breaking news stories and instant reaction.

Charities are constantly being told that they need to be more engaged on social networks to develop relationships and doing this can take a surprising amount of time. Posting a status, uploading a photo, responding to comments across more than one social networking site can become a full-time job. In fact some charities have been recruiting social media executives, or interns, to do this role in recent months.

Unless charities have sufficient resources how can they expect to make the most out of each platform? At a media conference I recently attended we were told not to try to do everything but to focus on one or two - but do it well. As yet, I can't see any incentive to drop Facebook or Twitter in favour of Google+, although it will be interesting to see if any charities do in the coming months.

It’s not just time-consuming for the organisation but for supporters – I’m sure I’m not the only person suffering from ‘social media fatigue’ - once upon a time notifications were a cause for excitement, but I found myself groaning when Google+ started spamming my email to tell me people had added me to ‘circles’, and swiftly turned off email notifications.

Maybe I’m being cynical, Google+ does have some unique features and it has promised that more will launch soon, remaining unapologetic about its intention to replace Facebook as top dog. So I’m not going be closing my account just yet (remember MySpace anyone?).

That all said please ‘friend’ me on Facebook, ‘follow’ me on Twitter and then put me in a ‘circle’ on Google+ because at the end of the day nobody wants to be only person not at the virtual party when it all kicks off.

P.S I’ve not even mentioned Jumo (a social network just for charities in case you had forgotten too) as I had completely forgotten about it until writing this blog - which says a lot I think. Is anyone really using it? I suspect not, but feel free to correct me.



Jack Ashman
Social Media Coordinator
14 Nov 2011

I think this is the general consenus within the charity sector, is it just *another* platform? Should we be pushing people from a to b to c?


[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear


  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

Kirsty Weakley

Kirsty Weakley is a reporter at Civil Society Media.

Follow Kirsty on Twitter @KirstyWeakley 

Popular Tags

The long and unhappy saga of the Local Sustainability Fund

29 Jun 2015

Last week the government announced a £20m pot of funding for charities. This sounds like good news, says...

Government can't ask charities to compete for contracts while savaging council spending

15 Jun 2015

The government cannot tell charities they must compete for contracts in a market while slashing the spending...

'Northern Powerhouse'? Almost as clearly defined as the big society

4 Jun 2015

Ian Allsop talks tomatoes and why charities should look north for income growth opportunities under the...