Share

No Shaw thing

No Shaw thing
Blogs

No Shaw thing

Governance | Ian Allsop | 22 Aug 2008

Ian Allsop doubts that Acevo's conduct over the dispute between the Shaw Trust and Ian Charlesworth has done anyone any good.

More details have emerged over the summer about the sudden departure of Shaw Trust chief executive, Ian Charlesworth.

It now seems that a row among management and trustees over plans to expand into Australia prompted his sudden dismissal.

Charlesworth was given six months’ notice and put on gardening leave five days after reportedly warning trustees that the plans were risky and could jeopardise the charity’s reputation and finances. The Charity Commission has got involved and it’s all become rather messy.

This drama is being played out in the full glare of the media, thanks in no small part to the efforts of Stephen Bubb, chief executive of Acevo. Not long after details of Charlesworth’s sudden departure, Acevo issued a press release pointing out what a good guy Charlesworth was and demanding his reinstatement.

At the time it was far from clear why Charlesworth had been sacked, so Acevo wading in rather than working quietly behind the scenes to resolve the dispute, seemed astonishing. Bubb has continued to hold court about the whole thing on his blog, which has led to a threat of legal action by the Shaw Trust.

If Bubb’s version of events is to be believed there may have been governance and management failings at the Shaw Trust. And Charlesworth does appear to have been treated shoddily. But is this the right way to go about dealing with the issue? Acevo’s role is to “connect, develop and represent the third sector’s leaders”. By coming out so strongly in support of Charlesworth it was certainly acting in that capacity, but its language was redolent of the sometimes blind loyalty of a trade union, particularly given that the background to the dismissal was not publicly known at the time.

Bubb is a passionate advocate of good governance standards, and feels that “this case does have wider implications for our sector and it is important that proceedings are transparent”. But perhaps Charlesworth and the charity’s cause would have been better served by a less public approach. Whatever the real story turns out to be, ultimately it is the Trust’s beneficiaries who could suffer.

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close ยป

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.