Share

Cable cuts the way for gift aid revisions

Cable cuts the way for gift aid revisions
Opinion

Cable cuts the way for gift aid revisions

Governance | 9 Aug 2010

As Vince Cable pledges this week to cut bureaucracy in charity regulation, Charities Aid Foundation head of policy and public affairs, Hannah Terrey sees hope for gift aid revisions.

Business secretary Vince Cable recently launched new rules to hand powers to individuals, companies and charities, cutting red-tape and bureaucracy. With the charity sector having to do more with less and with the burden of bureaucracy disproportionately falling on smaller charities and community organisations – the lifeblood of the 'Big Society' – this is welcome news. 

One of the key points is that a Regulatory Policy Committee will scrutinise and oversee all proposals before policy decisions are made. This, it is hoped, will speed up the delivery and effectiveness of new and current legislation. It is not yet clear either whether the members of the Regulatory Policy Committee have much experience or knowledge of the charity sector and the impact of regulations on it. We would welcome a review of the membership, or, at least, a mechanism to ensure that people with appropriate knowledge and expertise are involved in scrutinizing and impact-assessing proposals.

Freedom will require a shift in attitude

Of course there are a number of areas where our civil society would like to see reduced regulation, none more so than that surrounding gift aid and the substantial donor legislation. In fact I’d go as far as to say that many in the sector would be happy to see the substantial donor rules, which the government is currently trying to improve, scrapped altogether.

Gift aid regulation is obviously another prime contender - with layer upon layer of rules and regulations added during the lifetime of the scheme. We hope that this new approach provides an opportunity to radically simplify the system and bring it up-to-date. The Gift Aid Forum will agree its proposals for how the system could be improved by the end of September.

However, it will take a shift in HMRC’s current attitude to fraud and risk for this freedom to be achieved. Indeed, all the messages recently received from it, including the introduction of the fit and proper person’s test, have been about being firmer. Although we support the aim of preventing abuse of charity, the response has in the recent past been disproportionate and implemented without sufficient consultation.

If there really is ministerial will to increase trust and make things easier for charities, this has to be translated into action within government departments. Open dialogue between government and the sector about what is and isn’t possible would make it easier for the sector to contribute constructively to this process and debate.

Hannah Terrey is head of policy and public affairs at the Charities Aid Foundation

 

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

Time for charities to get real about going green

24 May 2012

Charities, like businesses should be held to account over their environmental standards, says Katy Wing.

Carrot and stick

21 May 2012

Community isn't led by government, so why wait for it to tell you what to do, protests Robert Ashton....

Two tribes - when male panelists meet female campaigners

17 May 2012

Men may have ruled the political panel, but women packed the punches from the audience in the Civil Society...

Accelerating insurance change for volunteer drivers

25 May 2012

Dan Sumners outlines Volunteering England's efforts to turn insurance red tape into a green light for...

Carrot and stick

21 May 2012

Community isn't led by government, so why wait for it to tell you what to do, protests Robert Ashton....

How to resolve your pensions problem

21 May 2012

How do you solve a problem like a pension deficit? David McHattie tackles the issue.