Share

Cometh the hour

Cometh the hour
Blogs

Cometh the hour1

Governance | Dorothy Dalton | 1 Jul 2010

Dorothy Dalton asks if the time has come for the Charity Commission to change the way it works and for the sector to accept the changes?

In 2009 the UK recorded a deficit of £159.2bn. At the end of December 2009 national debt stood at £950.4bn, equivalent to 68.1 per cent of gross domestic product. Huge cuts, impacting on every organisation and every citizen, are inevitable. Our regulator, the Charity Commission, will be no exception to the rule.

Yet for our sector to maintain and grow in public trust and confidence, we need a strong and adequately resourced regulator. Perhaps the time has come for the Commission to work in a radically different way and for the sector to accept these changes. For example, subject to the condition that the Commission is allowed to keep all fees, should the Commission not charge an annual return processing fee of £30 for all charities on the register as Companies House does? Maybe a fee can be charged for registering new charities? Again, fee levels could be kept in line with company registration fees.

To avoid becoming a tick-box regulator, should the Commission not carry out regular inspections? Earlier cutbacks have seen the virtual disappearance of random charity visits (a softer version of an inspection). Conceivably the time has come for the large charities division of the Commission to carry out regular (every six years or so) inspections of charities with incomes in excess of £5m?

In line with other regulators (eg Ofsted) the Commission should be able to charge a fee that covers the cost of the inspection. Again like school inspections, inspectors can be selected from current or recently retired experienced senior charity managers and experienced trustees. Inspection reports could be available on the Commission website thus allowing donors and beneficiaries to make more informed choices. Admittedly there are other costs to running an inspection regime but with the task of increasing trust and confidence in the sector being a core part of the Commission’s remit, it will be appropriate use of core funding.

While difficult financial times call upon all organisations to work and think differently, the Commission needs to concentrate its energies on its regulator role and evolve strategic alliances with both for-profit and not-for-profit organisations to help deliver some of its support role. To do this it will need to develop criteria for working with voluntary and for-profit organisations so that it cannot be accused of showing favouritism. 

 

Stolen
none
none
5 Jul 2010

Some of these measures would certainly enable the Charity Commission to become paid consultants rather than tax funded regulators since they are not registered auditors per se.

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close ยป

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.