Social Value Bill garners strong support in the House of Lords

Governance | Vibeka Mair | 30 Jan 2012

The Social Value Bill has edged closer to becoming law, after passing its second reading in the House of Lords.

Peers were near-unanimous in their support for the Bill, which will see “social value” instilled across public procurement.

The Private Member’s Bill was introduced in 2010 by Tory MP Chris White. White said: “I am delighted to see that the Bill has been given strong support in the House of Lords by all parties and that there is a desire to see it become law as soon as possible.

"This Bill is a great opportunity for us to not only spend public money better but also to support voluntary organisations, community groups and social enterprises across the country.

"I hope that if we can maintain this consensus we can achieve a positive step forward for our public services and our communities.”

Peers now have 14 days to table any amendments. If no amendments are made, the third reading in the House of Lords could be timetabled within three to four weeks.

The Bill has already gone through a number of amendments by government, including the removal of "social enterprise" from the Bill's title, and the removal of "social enterprise strategies" in the text.

Peter Holbrook, chief executive of Social Enterprise UK, said: “The level of cross-party support we witnessed today in the House of Lords signals the significance of this legislation and is a tribute to Chris White, who is moving this progressive Bill through parliament with great commitment and a desire to see real change in public sector commissioning practices.

"Politicians taking part in the debate clearly understood the advantages of having social enterprises delivering public sector contracts. This is heartening for our sector.”

Who's Who: Peter Holbrook

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Name *

Email *

Organisation

Job Title

Comments *

Verification *

* Please read our Community Standards

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

Robust but respectful debate
Strongly held opinions
Intelligent relevant discussion
The sharing of relevant experiences
New participants

We will not publish:

Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
The posting of contact details for yourself or others
Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.