Sir Stuart and Sir Stephen welcome greater umbrella unity 2

Governance | Vibeka Mair | 17 Nov 2011

Sir Stuart Etherington, chief executive of NCVO, has suggested that too much money from government led to an unstrategic and bloated national infrastructure sector, and welcomed recent moves towards rationalisation.

Sir Stuart made the comments at a meeting of the All-Party Parliamentary Group on Civil Society and Volunteering this week. He said national infrastructure bodies were too diverse in the past: “There were too many,” he said.

“It was not very strategic, it did need to be rationalised. When there’s money on the table it causes squabbling about who gets it. Now we have to collaborate as there is nowhere else to go.”

Sir Stuart also said there was a big case for the modernisation of local infrastructure bodies too: “There is no reason why volunteer bureaux and CVSs should be separate. They should be in the same place – there was more money so they split.”

Bubb: working more closely with NCVO

Today, Sir Stephen Bubb, CEO of Acevo, also used his speech to the Acevo national conference to welcome a more united sector. He said people would be happy that last night's conference dinner was held with the board of Acevo and NCVO in attendance.

“It’s the first time you’ll hear the chairs of Acevo and NCVO speaking at the same conference," he added. "We will be working more closely together.”

He credited the chairs of NCVO and Acevo with the closer working: “They said to us chief executives that we should get together.” Members had also urged better collaboration, he said.

The Office for Civil Society announced last year that it would be reducing its infrastructure body strategic partners from 42 to no more than 15, no organisation should receive more than a quarter of their income from them and that those who merged or collaborated had the best chance of success. Minister for civil society Nick Hurd described the structure he had inherited from Labour as “absolutely ludicrous”, particularly when frontline charities were having to swallow large budget cuts.

The announcement led to some mergers between strategic partners and a number of joint partner bids.

Directory: Association of Chief Executives of Voluntary Organisations (ACEVO) | National Council of Voluntary Organisations (NCVO)
Who's Who: Sir Stuart Etherington | Sir Stephen Bubb

Place a comment

Rob Jackson
Director
Rob Jackson Consulting Ltd
18 Nov 2011

And then there are those national infrastructure bodies who chose to merge/rationalise their work for the benefit of the sector a long time ago. For example, the creation of Volunteering England in 2004 and then the subsequent merge with Student Volunteering England in 2007.

[Reply]

Stolen
17 Nov 2011

Both Stuart and Stephen are talking from their tops and bottoms simultaneously.

Their egos and greed led to the squabbling, a waste of much actual funding and also prevented more money from coming into the sector (such as the loss of funds for the Leadership Centre from the OTS).

The two should be apologising to the entirety of the sector and not casting aspersions on the diversity of the infrastructure sector.

[Reply]

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Name *

Email *

Organisation

Job Title

Comments *

Verification *

* Please read our Community Standards

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

Robust but respectful debate
Strongly held opinions
Intelligent relevant discussion
The sharing of relevant experiences
New participants

We will not publish:

Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
The posting of contact details for yourself or others
Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.