Share

Public benefit definition not necessary say charity lawyers

Public benefit definition not necessary say charity lawyers
News

Public benefit definition not necessary say charity lawyers

Governance | Niki May Young | 11 May 2012

There is no need to change the public benefit test used during charity registration, according to charity lawyers Bates Wells & Braithwaite (BWB) in its submission to Lord Hodgson's Charities Act review.

The flexibility of the definition and interpretation of "public benefit" in the current test "is the means by which charity law has developed progressively", the lawyers said in what is believed to be the only submission to Lord Hodgson's review by a legal firm, shared exclusively with civilsociety.co.uk.

"This area is not straightforward," they said, "and while it might seem laudable to have a clear statutory definition of public benefit - nobody has yet been able to come up with a suitable one. The formulation we currently have in the Act which is based on case law is therefore best left as is."

However the amendments to the Charities Act had not been without merit, the lawyers advised: "The Charities Act 2006 certainly refocused attention on public benefit as an issue central to the duties of a charity trustee."

Commenting on the effects of changes to the Charities Act imposed in 2006 that were designed to remove the presumption of public benefit for education, religion or anti-poverty charities, BWB said that it was "difficult to tell" if this had been effective. The lawyers highlighted the disparity between the recent charity tribunal case with the Independent Schools Council where parts of the Commission's guidance relating to fee charging were struck out, and the lack of subsequent revisions to guidance by the Charity Commission

The Charity Commission confirmed that amendments on this matter have not yet been put out for consultation.

Additional charitable areas

Similarly the lawyers believe it is too early to tell whether desired areas of expansion brought in with the Act have been achieved, such as within the charity and sport category, but added that  there are other areas that could be included by clarifying the definition of 'charity'. Social finance could be facilitated as a result, the firm advised, and certain areas of journalism "deserve recognition as charitable objects in their own right," it added. 

While BWB doesn't believe 'public benefit' needs a clearer definition, it does point to contrasting definitions of 'charitable purpose' within the Charities Act 2011 which have yet to be addressed.

"This was identified as an issue during the consolidation exercise leading to the Charities Act 2011, but could not be rectified as it went beyond the remit of the consolidation exercise," it said. "The opportunity should now be taken to remove this anomaly and clarify the drafting for the lay audience."

Lord Hodgson is expected to present his completed review of the Charities Act 2006, which will consider further changes to the legal and regulatory framework for charities, to Parliament ahead of the summer recess this year.

 

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

Charities call for wider reform of the Gift Aid Small Donations Scheme

1 Jul 2016

Charities have called on HM Revenue and Customs to do more to remove the barriers for small charities...

Charity Commission investigates 72 RAF mess charities

1 Jul 2016

The Charity Commission has launched an investigation into 72 Royal Air Force mess charities, following...

Is your risk register a complete waste of time?

30 Jun 2016

Jonathan Orchard, partner at Sayer Vincent, talks about why charities need to re-think their risk policies....

Major donors are often ‘badly handled’ by fundraisers, according to NPC

1 Jul 2016

High net worth individuals and philanthropists are often “badly handled” by fundraisers, who lack...

Commission on the Donor Experience launches, outlines 25 focus areas

1 Jul 2016

The Commission on the Donor Experience has announced the 25 areas of fundraising that it will focus on...

Fundraising Regulator rejected by Scotland in favour of self-regulation

30 Jun 2016

The Scottish Council for Voluntary Organisations has rejected extending the remit of the Fundraising Regulator...

Lack of understanding of technology is a barrier to social change

1 Jul 2016

The voluntary sector’s poor understanding of the potential technology could have is one of the barriers...

Marie Curie appoints digital advisory board

21 Jun 2016

Marie Curie has appointed a digital advisory board to help it build on the successes of its digital transformation...

'Fake' charity app to help migrants at sea has been removed by Apple

21 Jun 2016

An app that claimed to support a charity rescuing refugees in the Mediterranean by enabling users to search...

Join the discussion

Twitter
 
Training

Attending our one day courses is a highly effective way of ensuring new and existing trustees fully understand their role, responsibilities and liabilities.

>> Find out more <<