Share

Dalton comes out against paid trustees and unitary boards

Dalton comes out against paid trustees and unitary boards
News

Dalton comes out against paid trustees and unitary boards 4

Governance | Tania Mason | 12 Jan 2010

Governance expert Dorothy Dalton has stormed into the debate over whether trustees should sit on unitary boards alongside the executive and be paid for their work.

In her leader in this month’s edition of Governance magazine, which she edits, Dalton refers to RNIB chair Kevin Carey’s speech to the Acevo conference late last year when he said that the current model of governance, where executive teams are accountable to unpaid, non-executive boards, is “bust”.

Carey advocated unitary boards comprising both executives and trustees. “It should be obvious to anyone that the one thing non-execs can’t do is effectively monitor execs, especially in the area of finance and budgeting," he told the conference.  "No director of finance is worth her salt if she can’t run rings around the honorary treasurer.”

But Dalton argues that the reputation of unitary boards has been tarnished by the failure of paid non-executive directors of banks to control the excessive risk-taking of their executive who, with them, are directors of the company.

She points out that Sir Richard Greenbury, who championed the unitary board against executive excesses, is now advising large companies to introduce two-tier boards. And she contends that the record of unitary NHS boards, in place for many years now, is no advertisement for the model.

Trustee remuneration

In an interview with Civil Society last December, Carey said that the sector should be able to pay its trustee boards without needing permission from the regulator.

“I am not telling all charities they have to pay their trustees,” he said.  “I am not telling any charity how to run itself – but there are certain things I want done.

“Charities that wish to pay for non-executive expertise should publish what they pay and let donors make up their own mind about whether they want to support the charity.  Caveat emptor is good enough the retail sector, why is it not good enough for charity?”

But Dalton concludes: “If the very large charities want unitary boards and paid trustees then let them have them as long as they do so purely in the interests of their beneficiaries and not in the interests of their trustees or executive.

“All we ask is that they stop trying to impose on others their model of governance on the grounds of good practice when most of us believe this model is wholly inappropriate.”

See here for Dalton's leader.

Catherine Clark
Head of Development
RSCM
22 Jan 2010

Right on, Ms Dalton! I'm with you 100% of the way.

Seb Elsworth
Director of Strategy
ACEVO
14 Jan 2010

I have written a response to Dorothy's editoral on my blog at http://bit.ly/7FHC1Z





Louise Rogers
Consultant
LR Associates
14 Jan 2010

Surely it is not just about the value to the beneficiaries but also the value to the voluntary sector as a whole. We must ensure that the third sector is as good as we say it is. Being a trustee of a large mainly London-based charity is very different to being a trustee of a small charity in the provinces but the beneficiaries are no less worthy of quality services.

One of my concerns is the lack of strategic abilities in many boards - sometimes boards will get a grant to pay an outsider to do a business plan (I know because I do them) but how much better to have a trustee who has the skills and the time to do this and pay them.

As an aside I have been on many boards and consider myself very skilled at this but it seems to me that it is the only skill in this country that I am not allowed to be paid for. What's my family supposed to eat - feelings of virtue?

Kevin Baughen
Founder
Bottom Line Ideas
13 Jan 2010

I agree whole-heartedly that appointees to charity boards should be made in the interests of their beneficiaries and supporters.

That said, if the same charity wants to pay it's trustees within this context, what's the problem? For too long, working trustees (as opposed to figure-heads or celebrities) have predominantly been retired or wealthy people simply because they are have the time and inclination.

It would be much tougher for a finance director to 'run rings around the honorary treasurer' if said treasurer were still a practising accountant wouldn't it...

It would also make much more sense to attract younger people as trustees as well as less well-off people to ensure a more accurate reflection of society. But I worry this won't happen as long as being a trustee is mutually exclusive from being able to pay the mortgage.

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

emailalert

Tribunal upholds Commission's merger decision but orders changes

24 May 2012

The Charity Tribunal has upheld the Charity Commission’s decision to allow two independent schools in...

Tender is issued for £200m National Citizen Service contracts

24 May 2012

The Department for Education has issued an invitation to tender for delivery of the National Citizen Service...

Trustees 'should be free to seek total return investments without approval'

24 May 2012

The Charity Law Association has recommended trustees are given the legal freedom to invest on a total...

Philanthropy in higher education consultation looks at collaboration with wider charity sector

25 May 2012

The Higher Education Funding Council for England has hinted at the possibility of collaboration with the...

Esmée Fairbairn: applications to trusts and foundations remain stable

25 May 2012

The Esmée Fairbairn Foundation is surprised not to have been inundated with applications for funding...

Charities in Twitter storm over balloon releases

24 May 2012

Charities are being urged to abandon balloon releases in a Twitter a campaign.

Charities express concerns over cookie compliance

25 May 2012

From tomorrow the Information Commissioner’s Office will enforce the law requiring all websites to inform...

Charities in Twitter storm over balloon releases

24 May 2012

Charities are being urged to abandon balloon releases in a Twitter a campaign.

Missing People plans to use Twitter to find child runaways

24 May 2012

Missing People is hoping to track down missing children using Twitter.

Join the discussion

Twitter
 
Training

Attending our one day courses is a highly effective way of ensuring new and existing trustees fully understand their role, responsibilities and liabilities.

>> Find out more <<