Share

Two-thirds of large charities will cut frontline services

Two-thirds of large charities will cut frontline services
News

Two-thirds of large charities will cut frontline services2

Finance | Niki May Young | 29 May 2012

Three-quarters of large charities have already or will be making redundancies in the next year, and two-thirds will be cutting frontline services according to a survey looking into the commissioning landscape for charities.

Charities with an income over £800,000 which receive some form of government funding were surveyed in When the going gets tough: Charities' experiences of public sector commissioning, with 101 responding. The research, conducted by New Philanthropy Capital and Zurich aims to understand how the new commissioning world is affecting the charity sector.

The research found that the majority of charities responding to a high level of government funding cuts are shedding staff or services as a result. 

Funding cuts

Similar to other studies conducted in this area, the research found that local authority cuts are hitting charities the hardest. Some 36 per cent said their overall government income had reduced compared to last year, with 12 per cent saying it had been reduced by 20 per cent or more. However 59 per cent said they were experiencing cuts in funding from local authorities with 23 per cent saying that these cuts are over 20 per cent. Circa 50 per cent said their overall government income stayed the same and 17 per cent said it had increased.

Charities were questioned on their perceptions as to why they were suffering the cuts, with much of the blame focused on the commissioning process. Some 53 per cent believe the price commissioners will pay has gone down and 46 per cent believe the service being provided through commissioning has been reduced. Around 26 per cent say that the service they provide has been cut altogether while 29 per cent said they had lost out on contracts to other charity, public sector or private sector providers. 

In addition 20 per cent said that the awarding of contracts and grants had been suspended and circa 42 per cent said grants had been cut altogether or were not being renewed.

The survey states that in response to these cuts, charities are, "having to make tough choices about the front-line services they provide for the people the are trying to help. Cuts are also having an impact on the size and structure of organsiations, and even their ability to survive".

Over 65 per cent have cut or expect to cut frontline services as a result of cuts, while 85 per cent have, or expect to change the services they provide to beneficiaries in the next year. 

The research highlights a high level of uncertainty in the sector with 30 per cent unsure of whether they are at risk of closure, while 9 per cent either had already suffered closure or expected it to happen in the next year. 

Staff are also feeling the brunt of cuts with 73 per cent of respondents having already made, or expecting to make redundancies in the next year.

Responses to the survey

Dan Corry, NPC chief executive said in his foreword to the survey that, "Of course, everyone finds periods of change difficult, and if new types of contract produce better outcomes more cost effectively, then we should surely pursue them. But we need to keep an eye on what is happening to providers as a result of all this. If we create a world with fewer charities providing services, then we may have lost something precious."

Responding to the research, shadow minister for civil society Gareth Thomas painted a harsher picture: "This is further grim evidence that ministers are not providing the leadership charities need.

"Huge cuts in funding, government contracts not delivering what ministers promised and the charity tax debacle are all eating away at the capacity of Britain's charities and community groups to make our communities stronger."

But current minister for civil society Nick Hurd himself did not respond, instead a spokesperson for the Office for Civil Society said:

"We know it is a very challenging environment for charities, especially those dependent on taxpayer funding. The sector cannot be immune from cuts but at the same time we are opening up more opportunities for charities to help us deliver better public services.

"Through interventions like Big Society Capital and a new Investment and Contract Readiness Fund we are helping ambitious charities access the capital they need to expand their services."

 

 

Hilary Barnard
Principal Consultant
HBMC
29 May 2012

The NPC report is important in strengthening the evidence base of the generally quite significantly worsening picture for third sector organisations who are commissioned by public service agencies. It is depressing to say that the survey results are hardly a great surprise; neither is the very inadequate response from the Office for Civil Society.

The issue increasingly for the sector is whether the underlying economic rationale of deep cuts, often disproprtionately falling on the sector and its beneficiaries, adds up. The NPC survey paints a picture of growing damage to the sector by these cuts, which appear to lack proper justification. Plan A has led to double dip recession. Following the election of a new French President, the focus is increasingly on growth, almost everywhere it seems except here in the UK. It is probably time for Plan B here, in which the sector and its beneficiaries can both contribute to and benefit.

Peter Horah
Private comment
None
29 May 2012

It was inevitable that if you sever the life-line that charities depend upon in the form of local authority contracts, the outcome will be cuts to front line services.

There is an unrealistic expectation from Government and others as to the resilience of charities who deliver very complex professional services.

Competence, trust and leadership are needed when implementing restructuring strategies – and we cannot have faith in a Government and their Ministers who demonstrate how little they know or understand the impact of their decisions.

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

Free eNews

Law Commission proposes checklist for trustees considering social investment

24 Apr 2014

The Law Commission has proposed changes to the law on how charities make social investments.

Amnesty charity reserves fell to 18 days' spend

23 Apr 2014

The charitable arm of Amnesty International UK had 18 days' worth of free reserves at the end of 2013,...

Northern Rock Foundation says closure 'inevitable'

22 Apr 2014

The Northern Rock Foundation will close after it failed to reach a funding agreement with Virgin Money,...

FRSB calls for new rules on asking elderly and vulnerable for donations

24 Apr 2014

The Fundraising Standards Board has recommended the Institute of Fundraising develops additional guidance...

ASA: “I wish I had breast cancer campaign” did not breach guidelines

23 Apr 2014

The Advertising Standards Agency has not upheld criticism over a series of controversial adverts by Pancreatic...

HMRC doubles scrutiny of charity gift aid claims following Cup Trust

22 Apr 2014

HM Revenue & Customs more than doubled the number of investigations into claims for gift aid in the...

'Technology can offer charities more than just online donations'

10 Apr 2014

Charities are focusing too much on using digital tools for fundraising instead of how technology can be...

Amnesty calls for 'full and frank disclosure' on alleged US surveillance

9 Apr 2014

Amnesty International has warned that alleged mass surveillance by the American intelligence agency NSA...

Virgin Money Giving launches app following year of growth

1 Apr 2014

Virgin Money Giving has launched an app for users after reporting that 30 per cent of traffic to its platform...

Join the discussion

Twitter
 
Training

Attending our one day courses is a highly effective way of ensuring new and existing trustees fully understand their role, responsibilities and liabilities.

>> Find out more <<