Charity Commission says late account filing is akin to drink driving for sector

Governance | Vibeka Mair | 29 Jun 2011

Sam Younger, chief executive of the Charity Commission, has called for the late filing of documents with the Commission to become the sector equivalent of drink driving.

Younger was speaking at the Institute of Chartered Secretaries and Administrators Charity Governance conference where he urged charity umbrella bodies to create such a culture change in the sector:

"I would like to see late filing of documents among charities become the sector equivalent of drink driving," he said. "Something society has regarded as excusable in the past, but which is in fact potentially hugely damaging. Not just to the charity in question, but to the wider environment in which it operates.

“I’m not, of course, suggesting failing to file on time is as dangerous as drink driving. But I do think there’s a role for sector bodies and umbrella groups to work towards a similar sort of culture change. To help us at the Commission get the message across that accountability is not an individual choice, it’s a duty that follows from charitable status."

Younger also addressed the Charity Commission’s new strategic direction, which will see it reduce its one-to-one advice to charities and its interventions in individual cases, as it focuses on its key regulatory priorities in light of a 30 per cent budget cut over the next spending period:

“Changes at the regulator will mean that charities will need to become more independent and more self-reliant,” he said. “The Commission will focus on providing excellent online guidance that helps trustees make up their own minds as to what is right for their charities.”

Earlier in the week, David Locke, executive director of charity services at the Charity Commission, said the regulator’s new direction would mean charities would come to rely more heavily on professional advisers.

Directory: Charity Commission
Who's Who: Sam Younger | David Locke

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Name *

Email *

Organisation

Job Title

Comments *

Verification *

* Please read our Community Standards

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

Robust but respectful debate
Strongly held opinions
Intelligent relevant discussion
The sharing of relevant experiences
New participants

We will not publish:

Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
The posting of contact details for yourself or others
Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.