Share

RNIB looking at whether it should continue in current form

Lesley-Anne Alexander, chief executive of RNIB
News

RNIB looking at whether it should continue in current form 3

Governance | Vibeka Mair | 16 Jun 2011

Lesley Anne-Alexander, chief executive of RNIB, has indicated that the charity could make major changes to its structure, and suggested it is actively considering further mergers and collaborations.

She also implied that fellow disability charity Guide Dogs for the Blind had rejected the idea of a merger with RNIB.

RNIB has already gone through a series of big restructures over the past two years. It has been augmenting its core organisation by adding other blindness charities and building the ‘RNIB Group’. Action for Blind was the first – it retained its own brand, but some RNIB trustees have joined the Action for Blind People board and visa-versa.

Alexander, who was speaking at a Knowledge Peers event on collaboration, said RNIB’s trustees were currently making "brave decisions" about the charity and were looking at whether RNIB needed to exist in its current form any longer.

“Trustees will be making the decision with integrity,” she said.

But Alexander ruled out a merger with Guide Dogs for the Blind, after being asked by a member of the audience whether it was on the cards, saying Guide Dogs was very "insular".

“Guide Dogs would be lovely,” she said. “Our trustees are open to any suggestions for bringing together the sight loss world to make it a better place for blind people. Guide Dogs do a fantastic job, but they are very insular and put up thinking which is not true as reasons for not getting together such as damaging its fundraising.”

On collaboration, Alexander said shared ambition was the secret to success. She also said that some had asked why RNIB bothered to collaborate when it was such a "big beast in the blindness jungle":

"Some people ask us why we bother to collaborate, and not continue as we are, when it’s so hard and gritty.

"Our RNIB board is made up of 18 trustees, 16 of whom are registered blind and partially-sighted people. Because they are victims of systems around sight loss they want to make the UK a better place for other blind and partially-sighted people.

"So we get over our ego. We are not here to protect RNIB, but to make the UK a better place for blind people and we will do whatever it takes."

Alexander said it was wrong for there to be 733 registered charities in the sight loss sector, saying it was confusing for blind people.

Michael Lewington
Director
Calibre Audio Library
17 Jun 2011

To support the last comment there are approximately 500 local talking newspapers who operate as part of the Talking Newspaper Federation. The majority of these are registered charities, add a further 200 local societies for the blind plus a few national charities supporting visually impaired people. Most blind people choose to deal with a few or as many as they wish perhaps their local newspaper, local society and perhaps one or two national charities. Is this confusing?

Gareth Edwards
CEO
Company Solutions
17 Jun 2011

I am not sure it is that confusing to have this many charities for the sight loss centre. Many of them are local blind societies working in a single local area delivering amazing services on a grass roots level. This quote implies bling people see all 733 when in reality they will see their local society and maybe a few national
oranisations in many cases, not really that confusing or a problem. Choice and diversity is what our sector is about and local organisations delivering locally tailored services are a wonderful part of this.

I worked at RNIB and now train many of the local societies - so I can see both perspectives, but think there is a place for independent local organisations as well as effective national bodies. It isn't 'wrong' to have choice or a certain number of organisations - they wouldn't be there if a need was not perceived for their existence.

Robin Bogg
CEO
BUBB
16 Jun 2011

Was "RNIB looking" deliberate?

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

emailalert

Tribunal upholds Commission's merger decision but orders changes

24 May 2012

The Charity Tribunal has upheld the Charity Commission’s decision to allow two independent schools in...

Tender is issued for £200m National Citizen Service contracts

24 May 2012

The Department for Education has issued an invitation to tender for delivery of the National Citizen Service...

Trustees 'should be free to seek total return investments without approval'

24 May 2012

The Charity Law Association has recommended trustees are given the legal freedom to invest on a total...

Philanthropy in higher education consultation looks at collaboration with wider charity sector

25 May 2012

The Higher Education Funding Council for England has hinted at the possibility of collaboration with the...

Esmée Fairbairn: applications to trusts and foundations remain stable

25 May 2012

The Esmée Fairbairn Foundation is surprised not to have been inundated with applications for funding...

Charities in Twitter storm over balloon releases

24 May 2012

Charities are being urged to abandon balloon releases in a Twitter a campaign.

Charities express concerns over cookie compliance

25 May 2012

From tomorrow the Information Commissioner’s Office will enforce the law requiring all websites to inform...

Charities in Twitter storm over balloon releases

24 May 2012

Charities are being urged to abandon balloon releases in a Twitter a campaign.

Missing People plans to use Twitter to find child runaways

24 May 2012

Missing People is hoping to track down missing children using Twitter.

Join the discussion

Twitter
 
Training

Attending our one day courses is a highly effective way of ensuring new and existing trustees fully understand their role, responsibilities and liabilities.

>> Find out more <<