Shetland charity to make trustees independent of government, following OSCR pressure

News

Shetland charity to make trustees independent of government, following OSCR pressure

Governance | Gareth Jones | 18 May 2011

Local councillors have conceded defeat in their long-running battle with OSCR over whether they are allowed to control the Shetland Charitable Trust.

At a meeting last week, trustees unanimously approved reforms proposed by general manager Ann Black, after legal advice insisted there was no option but to significantly reduce the number of councillors serving on the board.

The trustees had previously rejected the proposals in September last year, but were forced to concede on the issue after a specially-commissioned report by Roy Martin QC, whose services cost around £20,000, said changes were the only way to retain the Trust’s charitable status.

Currently, 21 of the 23 trustees are councillors, whereas Black’s proposals will ensure the “the majority of trustees should be drawn from outwith the council”.

These would see the new board reduced to 15 members.

A working group will now draw up detailed plans for making the changes.

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Name *

Email *

Organisation

Job Title

Comments *

Verification *

* Please read our Community Standards

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

Robust but respectful debate
Strongly held opinions
Intelligent relevant discussion
The sharing of relevant experiences
New participants

We will not publish:

Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
The posting of contact details for yourself or others
Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.