OSCR investigates Scottish zoo following misconduct allegations

Governance | Niki May Young | 10 May 2011

The Office of the Scottish Charity Regulator (OSCR) has launched an inquiry into the Royal Zoological Society of Scotland (RZSS) after allegations of misconduct were made against a senior staff member at Edinburgh Zoo, which is owned by the charity.

Donald Emslie, executive chair of RZSS, said that “unsubstantiated” and “anonymous” allegations regarding Gary Wilson, acting chief executive at Edinburgh Zoo, had been presented to the charity. OSCR was immediately advised and an internal investigation is currently being conducted “at board level”.

The charity was unable to comment on the nature of the allegations, he advised, but added: "Every effort is being made to treat Gary Wilson in a way that is both fair and transparent. This is not a police matter as it is not known if there is any truth to the allegations."

An OSCR spokesperson confirmed that OSCR currently has an open inquiry into the Royal Zoological Society of Scotland. “It is therefore not appropriate for us to comment further,” they said.

Edinburgh Zoo opened in July 1913 and is the main facility for the RZSS. The charity reported an income of over £12m in its last accounts filed in 2010.

“Problems with individuals are not reflective of the amazing work of the charity as a whole,” Emslie said. “Speculation that RZSS could lose charity status is totally unfounded, unsubstantiated and highly unlikely."

Last month the Zoo faced speculation that problems with its management could prevent the upcoming relocation of giant pandas to the Zoo.

"Recent internal issues at the Zoo have no bearing on the operational aspects of the Giant Panda project," RZSS advised in April.

Directory: Office of the Scottish Charity Regulator (OSCR)

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Name *

Email *

Organisation

Job Title

Comments *

Verification *

* Please read our Community Standards

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

Robust but respectful debate
Strongly held opinions
Intelligent relevant discussion
The sharing of relevant experiences
New participants

We will not publish:

Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
The posting of contact details for yourself or others
Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.