Share

Care charity loaned over £173,000 to staff member to buy house

Care charity loaned over £173,000 to staff member to buy house
News

Care charity loaned over £173,000 to staff member to buy house

Governance | Niki May Young | 4 Apr 2011

The Charity Commission has concluded its report into Broad View Care Ltd after its second statutory investigation which revealed the charity had loaned over £173,000 to its director of nursing to buy a house.

Broad View Care was previously a private company owned by its director of nursing care (DNC) and director of finance (FD), before registering as a charity and submitting its first accounts in 2005. But, the Commission advised, it registered “without fully considering the legal roles and responsibilities that came with charitable registration”.

The charity subsequently became the subject of two statutory inquiries by the Commission which looked into concerns over the governance of the charity, including a lack of properly-appointed trustees, and the use of charity funds.

The first inquiry concluded with the appointment of new trustees and the sale of the charity’s care homes in Coventry, ceasing its operations in the area in January 2007, and with the resignation of the DNC and FD.

However, as the Commission underwent its assessment of the charity’s progress in implementing a new governance structure ten months later, it was made aware that both employees had returned to the charity, being paid £36,000 per annum each, without the charity having operated an open recruitment process or advertising the positions. The Commission concluded that there were now “serious concerns that the charity’s assets were at risk”.

A second statutory inquiry was then launched revealing that £100,000 of the charity’s funds had been used to settle debts and to cover redundancy payments to its staff. It was also revealed that the charity paid for the relocation of the DNC to Devon after the charity decided to provide services in this region. This included three months of rent-free accommodation while he arranged his move, £550 per month towards housing costs when he moved to temporary accommodation from August 2007 to April 2008, and a loan of £173,936.47 to purchase a property in Devon.

The inquiry also found that charity funds had been used by the FD to purchase a car, on the basis that the charity owed him money for unpaid wages, and that the charity had loaned him money in advance of his wages. More than £5,700 was found to be owed to the charity by the FD when the second inquiry launched.

The charity’s income in the year ending 2008 was just £3,839 while its expenditure was £82,160 and in the subsequent year its income was just £320 with an expenditure of £45,295.

In both inquiries the Commission had found the trustees negligent in their actions, failing to respond in a timely manner to the Commission, failing to address the shortfalls in their business plan and failing to adhere to the Commission’s advice to seek legal advice on the legality of the FD’s ongoing employment among its concerns over the charity’s financial management. The charity was “heading towards a moribund state”, the Commission said.

However the Commission has concluded its report satisfied that the charity had been “restored” by its intervention and that “ultimately the trustees had taken sufficient measures to improve the governance of the charity and ensure that they comply with their legal duties and responsibilities in the future”.  

By the conclusion of the report both the DNC and the FD had ceased their employment with the charity, following an interim period where the FD helped improve the business plan before his full-time role was deemed no longer necessary. The funds used by the DNC and FD were recovered and the charity’s objects are currently being re-written to reflect the purpose of a holiday home purchased for use by the charity’s beneficiaries.  

 

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

emailalert

Tribunal upholds Commission's merger decision but orders changes

24 May 2012

The Charity Tribunal has upheld the Charity Commission’s decision to allow two independent schools in...

Tender is issued for £200m National Citizen Service contracts

24 May 2012

The Department for Education has issued an invitation to tender for delivery of the National Citizen Service...

Trustees 'should be free to seek total return investments without approval'

24 May 2012

The Charity Law Association has recommended trustees are given the legal freedom to invest on a total...

Philanthropy in higher education consultation looks at collaboration with wider charity sector

25 May 2012

The Higher Education Funding Council for England has hinted at the possibility of collaboration with the...

Esmée Fairbairn: applications to trusts and foundations remain stable

25 May 2012

The Esmée Fairbairn Foundation is surprised not to have been inundated with applications for funding...

Charities in Twitter storm over balloon releases

24 May 2012

Charities are being urged to abandon balloon releases in a Twitter a campaign.

Charities express concerns over cookie compliance

25 May 2012

From tomorrow the Information Commissioner’s Office will enforce the law requiring all websites to inform...

Charities in Twitter storm over balloon releases

24 May 2012

Charities are being urged to abandon balloon releases in a Twitter a campaign.

Missing People plans to use Twitter to find child runaways

24 May 2012

Missing People is hoping to track down missing children using Twitter.

Join the discussion

Twitter
 
Training

Attending our one day courses is a highly effective way of ensuring new and existing trustees fully understand their role, responsibilities and liabilities.

>> Find out more <<