Lib Dems float voluntary sector impact assessment idea 1

Governance | Niki May Young | 16 Mar 2011

Lord Rennard, chair of the Acevo Commission on the Big Society, has advised that the Liberal Democrats are looking at the idea of a required voluntary sector impact assessment to be undertaken within any future legislative proposals.

The former Liberal Democrat chief executive made the comments at the Big Society in the North event in Liverpool on Monday, advising that there is a need for the government to provide a "clearer narrative and more consistent approach" to the Big Society.

"An idea currently being looked at by the Liberal Democrats is to require all legislative proposals to have a voluntary sector impact assessment - just as we require assessments for environmental, equality and human rights impact," he told the audience.

The move is one of several improvements Lord Rennard suggested to aid the transition period for the sector, which include changing the tax system to promote philanthropy, and removing "unnecessary bureaucratic barriers to volunteering" to "remove financial disincentives to volunteer".

His speech follows the endorsement by the Liberal Democrat Federal Policy Committee on Saturday (12 March) of the Voluntary Sector and Volunteering Policy paper outlining the party's intentions for the sector.

Directory: Association of Chief Executives of Voluntary Organisations (ACEVO)

Place a comment

Paul Edwards
Community development worker
N/A
17 Mar 2011

I am getting heartily sick of reading about various political parties 'intentions' for the voluntary sector as though it is just another arm of government to be told what to do and how to do it. The same level of interference in the private manufacturing sector would be unthinkable though, perhaps, that sector may welcome less government neglect. It is about time that the peak organisations of the sector underlined heavily the independence and autonomy of the sector

[Reply]

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Name *

Email *

Organisation

Job Title

Comments *

Verification *

* Please read our Community Standards

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

Robust but respectful debate
Strongly held opinions
Intelligent relevant discussion
The sharing of relevant experiences
New participants

We will not publish:

Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
The posting of contact details for yourself or others
Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.