Share

Impact Coalition 'under review' by Acevo

Impact Coalition logo
News

Impact Coalition 'under review' by Acevo2

Governance | Tania Mason | 10 Feb 2011

Acevo is struggling to put the Impact Coalition on a sustainable financial footing and is planning to review its patronage of the project.

The Impact Coalition, which stands for Improving Accountability, Clarity and Transparency, moved into Acevo from the Institute of Fundraising in the middle of 2009. At the time, the Institute had decided that it had already devoted enough funds to Impact - £100,000 over two years - and did not want to contribute much more. Shortly afterward other sector bodies stepped in to fill the funding gap - Charities Aid Foundation gave £15,000 and the Charity Finance Directors’ Group and Public Fundraising Regulatory Association each provided £5,000.  

But since those grants expired last summer, Acevo has been left to foot the bill for the Coalition’s work. Although about 380 charities have signed up to the Impact principles, it is not a membership body and does not charge any fees.  

When it moved into Acevo, sector leaders agreed that the chief executives' organisation was the more logical home for the Coalition’s work, as improving charities’ commitment to transparency and accountability needs to be led from the very top.

But Acevo chief executive Sir Stephen Bubb has admitted to Civil Society that it is under review because of the difficulty in funding it: “We need to think about how we take it forward because it has never been properly funded. We will be reviewing it.”

He added that he hoped a solution could be found to move it to a sustainable footing because “it is a fairly core part of what we do”.

“It’s an important piece of work actually, given the issues around accountability that certain MPs have raised, it is something we need to be on top of. We took it over because we want to push it forward but we need to find ways of making it sustainable.”

'Chicken and egg situation'

CFDG said its £5,000 grant to the organisation was always intended to be a one-off. PFRA chief executive Mick Aldridge said his board was broadly in favour of continuing to support Impact but had found itself in “something of a chicken and egg situation”:

“We’ve said we don’t want to give more money without seeing some concrete outcomes, and they’ve said they are finding it hard to generate concrete outcomes without more funding.”

Aldridge said he still believed it was an important project with a lot of potential “but we don’t want to be the only people co-funding it”.

Since being under the auspices of Acevo, Impact has published its Transparency Manifesto and last June it announced that it had instigated talks with the PFRA about creating a ‘rapid response unit’ dedicated to combating negative press coverage about charities and fundraising. Aldridge said this project was “still on the cards” provided Impact could secure its future.

The Impact Coalition has planned three member seminars for the year ahead - 'Building stakeholder trust and confidence' in April; ' Hallmarks of an accountable charity' in July and 'Leadership and accountability' in October.

 
 

Seb Elsworth
Director of Strategy
ACEVO
11 Feb 2011

To clarify:

The implication in this story that ACEVO is reviewing our hosting of the ImpACT Coalition is not true. We remain completely committed to hosting the Coalition, and raising the profile of the importance of accountability and transparency amongst chief executives and trustees.

Stephen was talking about the need to continue to review the opportunities for this important work to be supported so that we can increase the effectiveness of the Coalition's work and reach more of the sector's leaders.

Stolen
11 Feb 2011
Response to [Seb Elsworth]

For what it's worth, Els comment is akin to a torchlight in a dark room.

Pity the light in the room will not be switched on.

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

Telegraph publishes clarification to its news story about the True and Fair Foundation report

11 Feb 2016

The Daily Telegraph has printed a clarification to its report accusing charities of spending too little...

Charity sector calls on Prime Minister to overturn anti-advocacy clauses

11 Feb 2016

More than 140 charity leaders have written to the Prime Minister calling on him to reverse the decision...

Age UK suspends energy tariff in face of widespread media criticism

10 Feb 2016

Age UK has suspended an energy deal it recommended to pensioners, and which a Sun investigation claimed...

Commission revised fundraising guidance too fast, says NCVO

12 Feb 2016

The Charity Commission revised its guidance on fundraising too fast, and does not properly explain its...

Trustees need to be involved in fundraising, Lynda Thomas tells Fundraising Live

11 Feb 2016

Trustees should be involved in raising money for their charities so they can see how difficult it is,...

Lord Grade announces membership of Fundraising Regulator board

11 Feb 2016

Lord Grade, chair of the Fundraising Regulator, has today announced the eight people who will make up...

Charity Commission to start live-streaming public meetings

9 Feb 2016

The Charity Commission has announced that people can watch its next public meeting online via a live video...

JustGiving raises £1m through WhatsApp shares in less than a year

5 Feb 2016

JustGiving users who arrived at the site from WhatsApp have donated £1.175m since the giving platform...

ICO opens consultation into revised code of practice on data privacy notices

3 Feb 2016

The Information Commissioner’s Office has opened a consultation into its code of practice guidelines...

Join the discussion

Twitter
 
Training

Attending our one day courses is a highly effective way of ensuring new and existing trustees fully understand their role, responsibilities and liabilities.

>> Find out more <<