Share

Impact Coalition 'under review' by Acevo

Impact Coalition logo
News

Impact Coalition 'under review' by Acevo2

Governance | Tania Mason | 10 Feb 2011

Acevo is struggling to put the Impact Coalition on a sustainable financial footing and is planning to review its patronage of the project.

The Impact Coalition, which stands for Improving Accountability, Clarity and Transparency, moved into Acevo from the Institute of Fundraising in the middle of 2009. At the time, the Institute had decided that it had already devoted enough funds to Impact - £100,000 over two years - and did not want to contribute much more. Shortly afterward other sector bodies stepped in to fill the funding gap - Charities Aid Foundation gave £15,000 and the Charity Finance Directors’ Group and Public Fundraising Regulatory Association each provided £5,000.  

But since those grants expired last summer, Acevo has been left to foot the bill for the Coalition’s work. Although about 380 charities have signed up to the Impact principles, it is not a membership body and does not charge any fees.  

When it moved into Acevo, sector leaders agreed that the chief executives' organisation was the more logical home for the Coalition’s work, as improving charities’ commitment to transparency and accountability needs to be led from the very top.

But Acevo chief executive Sir Stephen Bubb has admitted to Civil Society that it is under review because of the difficulty in funding it: “We need to think about how we take it forward because it has never been properly funded. We will be reviewing it.”

He added that he hoped a solution could be found to move it to a sustainable footing because “it is a fairly core part of what we do”.

“It’s an important piece of work actually, given the issues around accountability that certain MPs have raised, it is something we need to be on top of. We took it over because we want to push it forward but we need to find ways of making it sustainable.”

'Chicken and egg situation'

CFDG said its £5,000 grant to the organisation was always intended to be a one-off. PFRA chief executive Mick Aldridge said his board was broadly in favour of continuing to support Impact but had found itself in “something of a chicken and egg situation”:

“We’ve said we don’t want to give more money without seeing some concrete outcomes, and they’ve said they are finding it hard to generate concrete outcomes without more funding.”

Aldridge said he still believed it was an important project with a lot of potential “but we don’t want to be the only people co-funding it”.

Since being under the auspices of Acevo, Impact has published its Transparency Manifesto and last June it announced that it had instigated talks with the PFRA about creating a ‘rapid response unit’ dedicated to combating negative press coverage about charities and fundraising. Aldridge said this project was “still on the cards” provided Impact could secure its future.

The Impact Coalition has planned three member seminars for the year ahead - 'Building stakeholder trust and confidence' in April; ' Hallmarks of an accountable charity' in July and 'Leadership and accountability' in October.

 
 

Seb Elsworth
Director of Strategy
ACEVO
11 Feb 2011

To clarify:

The implication in this story that ACEVO is reviewing our hosting of the ImpACT Coalition is not true. We remain completely committed to hosting the Coalition, and raising the profile of the importance of accountability and transparency amongst chief executives and trustees.

Stephen was talking about the need to continue to review the opportunities for this important work to be supported so that we can increase the effectiveness of the Coalition's work and reach more of the sector's leaders.

Stolen
11 Feb 2011
Response to [Seb Elsworth]

For what it's worth, Els comment is akin to a torchlight in a dark room.

Pity the light in the room will not be switched on.

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

Free eNews

Children's charities call for an end to 'price-driven competition' in public service provision

28 Jul 2014

A coalition of 29 children’s charities and trade unions including Barnardo's and Action for Children...

PTA-UK: Big Society Network chief was confident of funding

28 Jul 2014

PTA-UK has revealed that it turned down an invitation from Big Society Network to be a partner in its...

Big Society Network chair’s company gave £64k to Conservative Party

28 Jul 2014

A company owned by the chair of Big Society Network donated services totalling more than £54,000 to the...

PTA-UK: Big Society Network chief was confident of funding

28 Jul 2014

PTA-UK has revealed that it turned down an invitation from Big Society Network to be a partner in its...

FRSB rejects complaint against the RSPB

25 Jul 2014

The Fundraising Standards Board has thrown out a complaint that the RSPB’s Abernethy Forest appeal made...

Culture, Media and Sport Committee launches inquiry into society lotteries

25 Jul 2014

The Culture, Media and Sport Select Committee has launched an inquiry into society lotteries that will...

Online donations forms are too long and cost charities donations, finds report

28 Jul 2014

One third of leading charity websites require potential donors to complete more than 20 actions before...

Greenpeace video removed from YouTube following copyright claim

14 Jul 2014

A campaign video by Greenpeace against Lego’s relationship with Shell has been subject to a copyright...

Oxfam advert removed after appearing before extremist videos

10 Jul 2014

Oxfam has removed one of its adverts from YouTube after it was shown on channels showing content from...

Join the discussion

Twitter
 
Training

Attending our one day courses is a highly effective way of ensuring new and existing trustees fully understand their role, responsibilities and liabilities.

>> Find out more <<