Share

Royal Institution to repay £3.2m of missapplied funds

Royal Institution to repay £3.2m of missapplied funds
News

Royal Institution to repay £3.2m of missapplied funds

Governance | Vibeka Mair | 25 Nov 2010

The trustees of the Royal Institution are in the process of repaying £3.2m of funds which were incorrectly used to redevelop the charity’s building, the Charity Commission has revealed.

The Charity Commission, today, has released a report into the Royal Institution (RI) which was subject to a regulatory investigation last year.

The investigation was triggered in December 2008 by the RI council of trustees who realised they had used money to pay for a redevelopment from restricted funds that were held on particular terms.

The Charity Commission and the Royal Institution worked together to develop a repayment schedule which will see the RI replenish the amounts of endowment and restricted funds invested in the refurbishment at the rate of £350,000 for up to 15 years from 2010/11 and rebuild its reserves at the rate of £150,000 for up to 15 years from 2010/11.

The regulatory report also covered an investigation into an unauthorised lease of charity land to a company in which a RI member had an interest.

The Commission decided not to take any further action as it would not be in the charity’s best interest to enter into a new lease, which is due to expire on 30 November 2011.

The Charity Commission also noted the high level of press interest and complaints about the controversial departure of the RI’s director Baroness Greenfield.

The Commission report said: “As matters of employment are generally the responsibility of trustees, the Commission will not normally become involved in employment issues. As a result, this issue is not covered in this report.”

Earlier this year the RI was embroiled in nearly four months of in-fighting, which began when the trustees decided Greenfield’s director post was no longer affordable in the light of recent funding problems. Their actions resulted in a reported sex discrimination lawsuit from Greenfield and a failed coup by some charity members to expel the board.

In the end, the RI and Greenfield released a joint statement saying “they had reached a full agreement as to the terms for Baroness Greenfield’s departure from the post of director and that neither the RI nor Greenfield would make any further comment on the terms or the circumstances leading up to her departure".

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

emailalert

Tribunal upholds Commission's merger decision but orders changes

24 May 2012

The Charity Tribunal has upheld the Charity Commission’s decision to allow two independent schools in...

Tender is issued for £200m National Citizen Service contracts

24 May 2012

The Department for Education has issued an invitation to tender for delivery of the National Citizen Service...

Trustees 'should be free to seek total return investments without approval'

24 May 2012

The Charity Law Association has recommended trustees are given the legal freedom to invest on a total...

Philanthropy in higher education consultation looks at collaboration with wider charity sector

25 May 2012

The Higher Education Funding Council for England has hinted at the possibility of collaboration with the...

Esmée Fairbairn: applications to trusts and foundations remain stable

25 May 2012

The Esmée Fairbairn Foundation is surprised not to have been inundated with applications for funding...

Charities in Twitter storm over balloon releases

24 May 2012

Charities are being urged to abandon balloon releases in a Twitter a campaign.

Charities express concerns over cookie compliance

25 May 2012

From tomorrow the Information Commissioner’s Office will enforce the law requiring all websites to inform...

Charities in Twitter storm over balloon releases

24 May 2012

Charities are being urged to abandon balloon releases in a Twitter a campaign.

Missing People plans to use Twitter to find child runaways

24 May 2012

Missing People is hoping to track down missing children using Twitter.

Join the discussion

Twitter
 
Training

Attending our one day courses is a highly effective way of ensuring new and existing trustees fully understand their role, responsibilities and liabilities.

>> Find out more <<