Civil society shows a lack of climate literacy, report shows 1

Governance | Niki May Young | 1 Nov 2010

Civil society organisations do not see tackling climate change as relevant to their core work, a Green Alliance report has found.

The New Times, New Connections report conducted desk-based research and interviews of 222 non-environmental organisations to discover how the sector can act to curb climate change without the need for legislation.

Acevo, ActionAid, Christian Aid, CAN and WWF were among the organisations researched in the report which revealed that climate change was low on the priority list for many of the organisations questioned and that there is a "lack of climate literacy" in the sector.

"Wider civil society organisations have a hugely significant role in tackling climate change and there are real imperatives for a much broader range of organisations to think more strategically about what it means for their work and beneficiaries," said a spokesperson for the Green Alliance.

"It has the potential to roll back progress on a wide range of goals, including efforts to tackle poverty and inequalities and to protect the vulnerable. Once the links are made, the power of civil society organisations to influence decision makers with compelling new perspectives will be invaluable in securing more rapid and ambitious progress on climate change," they added.

"Building climate literacy" will be a priority for the Green Alliance which will explore how to support this as a follow up to the study.

The report also called for the sector to work together to become better informed and build a wider understanding of the issues around climate change but stated that climate change will be "embedded in civil society efforts to build the big society".

"Smarter funding" will also be needed to differentiate projects aimed at tackling the impact of climate change in its wider sense from those dealing simply with the 'environmental' impact, the report concluded.

Directory: Association of Chief Executives of Voluntary Organisations (ACEVO) | ActionAid | Christian Aid | World Wildlife Fund UK (WWF UK)

Place a comment

Craig Goodrich
1 Nov 2010

The Green Alliance has it exactly backward. The public -- and many organizations -- have become "climate literate" enough to realize when they're being had by fat cats eager to suck up subsidies and pseudoenvironmentalists willing to utterly destroy millions of acres of countryside and wildlife habitat in pursuit of ideological goals.

There is no real science behind the CO2 hysteria. All of the actual scientific measurements demonstrate that the "anthropogenic global warming" theory is even sillier than it at first appeared two decades ago. Notice that every real scientist who doesn't depend on the theory for lunch money rejects it out of hand after looking at its alleged logic and evidence.

[Reply]

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Name *

Email *

Organisation

Job Title

Comments *

Verification *

* Please read our Community Standards

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

Robust but respectful debate
Strongly held opinions
Intelligent relevant discussion
The sharing of relevant experiences
New participants

We will not publish:

Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
The posting of contact details for yourself or others
Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.