Nesta to trial local action programmes to inform Big Society agenda

Governance | Vibeka Mair | 26 Oct 2010

The National Endowment for Science, Technology and the Arts (Nesta) will be piloting programmes to test community organisation for the Big Society agenda.

The scheme, called Neighbourhood Challenge, will look to demonstrate how community organisers, when equipped with the right skills, and small, catalytic amounts of money can come up with innovative responses to local priorities, particularly in areas with low levels of social capital.

It will see Nesta work with partners to trial different approaches to community organising and supporting community-led innovation. Ten community organisations from across England will be selected to participate in the 18-month programme. Successful applicants will receive funding to trial an approach to community organising, with practical tools and training to help people set up local campaigns, new community projects and new social enterprises.

From February 2011 to February 2012 the participating organisations will receive financial and in-kind support to run their programmes in the neighbourhoods they have selected. The precise level of support will depend on the approach taken, but as a guide Nesta expects to provide each area with at least £150,000 worth of support.

Nesta will also help establish local social challenge prizes to incentivise and reward community-led action.

The Challenge will be rigorously evaluated to inform the government’s thinking about how to make the Big Society work for all communities in the UK.

To register interest, or for more information, go to www.nesta.org.uk/neighbourhood_challenge. The deadline for submitting expressions of interest is 22nd November at 12 noon.

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Name *

Email *

Organisation

Job Title

Comments *

Verification *

* Please read our Community Standards

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

Robust but respectful debate
Strongly held opinions
Intelligent relevant discussion
The sharing of relevant experiences
New participants

We will not publish:

Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
The posting of contact details for yourself or others
Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.