Share

Martin Brookes suggests moral index for charities

Martin Brookes
News

Martin Brookes suggests moral index for charities 5

Governance | Niki May Young | 29 Sep 2010

Martin Brookes, chief executive of think-tank New Philanthropy Capital will suggest that charities should be ranked according to their societal benefit, in a speech at the Royal Society for the encouragement of Arts, Manufactures and Commerce tonight.  

Addressing the audience at a lecture entitled 'The Morality of Charity', Brookes will compare the encouragement of people to give more with the need to encourage people to “give well”.

“If one can construct a moral argument that people should give and give more, is it not also morally right to give well? There is no difference between the two in principle, only in practice,” he will say.

Brookes will point to a lack of current systems informing potential donors about the most worthy charitable causes. A solution, he will suggest, is to design “frameworks that catalogue charitable causes, and, ultimately, charities, according to their field of work”. 

“One could then say that certain causes and organisations are inherently more worthwhile than others,” he will add.

He will go on to suggest that if all charities are not deemed equally worthy of donors' money, then perhaps a differential tax regime should be applied to the charities and/or their donors.

But the ideas in his upcoming speech have been criticised by both Acevo’s Stephen Bubb and the Charities Aid Foundation’s John Low.

"Getting into arguments about a moral index will make donors very uncomfortable," said Bubb.

"Who decides which is the more moral cause? People need to be better informed but charity has to remain a matter of individual choice," he added. And John Low told The Guardian newspaper that giving was a matter of personal preference and “our vulnerabilities”.

Brookes will not be surprised at these views; he will admit in his speech that while he supports a classification system to helpp inform donor choces, "we as a society are not ready for this yet. Donors don’t care enough and would not respond to these signals."

This is not the first time Brookes has mooted such ideas - he wrote a controversial blog last October condemning the fact that donkey sanctuaries attract so much more money than domestic violence charities

While Brookes concedes that much more research and experimentation would be required to implement the concept of an index based on moral worthiness, his 33-page speech will provide many arguments and anecdotes for the idea this evening.

 

Debra Samuels
30 Sep 2010

This simply smacks of a small player in the UK charity scene trying to make a name for himself by being controversial.

It's sad that this grasping for the limelight gets coloumn inches.

Alisdair Barron
Chief Excutive
Children in Distress
4 Oct 2010
Response to [ Debra Samuels]

Debra Samuels critical contribution is a rather cynical comment; in straitened times like these when the donor pound is at a premium, perhaps realistically it is time that donors had the chance to evaluate charities against their cost-effective impact and social benefit.

Saving and improving lives particularly of vulnerable children has untold benefits. To dismiss this valuable suggestion as "a small charity player seeking publicity" says more about the Debra Samuels's outlook on life than the proposal itself.

Gordon Hunter
Director
Lincolnshire Community Foundation
30 Sep 2010

This is as workable as a moral index for jobs.
Is a teacher worth more than a nurse, a General more than a Minister?
There's no point discussing it, really.
Mind you, Martin does well to sustain a £3 million charity and 30 staff by selling the emperor's new clothes.

Amanda Coleman
30 Sep 2010

This is nonsense. Charities are there to protect and help the most vulnerable and it must be down to individuals to make their own decisions.

John Thompson
Director
Changing Business
29 Sep 2010

A moral index for charities would be bathed in subjectivity and therefore of limited use IMO.
What might be worth looking at though is a Charity4Good index designed along similar lines to that of the FTSE4Good index series and looking to rank (major) charities by an agreed set of responsibility standards. Indeed, this is an idea I've thrown around since 2006 and was mentioned in Professional Fundraising's agent provocateur piece by Steve Crump, former director of fundraising at Whizz-Kidz, 1st September 2006 and entitled:

"Time for charities to prove their worth"

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

emailalert

Tribunal upholds Commission's merger decision but orders changes

24 May 2012

The Charity Tribunal has upheld the Charity Commission’s decision to allow two independent schools in...

Tender is issued for £200m National Citizen Service contracts

24 May 2012

The Department for Education has issued an invitation to tender for delivery of the National Citizen Service...

Trustees 'should be free to seek total return investments without approval'

24 May 2012

The Charity Law Association has recommended trustees are given the legal freedom to invest on a total...

Philanthropy in higher education consultation looks at collaboration with wider charity sector

25 May 2012

The Higher Education Funding Council for England has hinted at the possibility of collaboration with the...

Esmée Fairbairn: applications to trusts and foundations remain stable

25 May 2012

The Esmée Fairbairn Foundation is surprised not to have been inundated with applications for funding...

Charities in Twitter storm over balloon releases

24 May 2012

Charities are being urged to abandon balloon releases in a Twitter a campaign.

Charities express concerns over cookie compliance

25 May 2012

From tomorrow the Information Commissioner’s Office will enforce the law requiring all websites to inform...

Charities in Twitter storm over balloon releases

24 May 2012

Charities are being urged to abandon balloon releases in a Twitter a campaign.

Missing People plans to use Twitter to find child runaways

24 May 2012

Missing People is hoping to track down missing children using Twitter.

Join the discussion

Twitter
 
Training

Attending our one day courses is a highly effective way of ensuring new and existing trustees fully understand their role, responsibilities and liabilities.

>> Find out more <<