NCVO calls for sector spending to remain 'neutral'

Governance | Gareth Jones | 2 Sep 2010

NCVO has made its submission to the Treasury spending review, calling on the government to ensure the net effect on voluntary and community organisations is “at least neutral”.

The document also asks the Treasury to ensure settlement letters ask departments to “be mindful of the need to strengthen civil society”, therefore looking at the impact of their spending decisions, as well as asking them to consider how they might “work with the sector to do things differently and more cost-effectively”.

The submission, written by senior policy officer James Allen (pictured), also argues for:

Localisation and decentralisation
Supporting and strengthening the Compact, with funding agreements set for at least three years
A level playing field for the sector when bidding for contracts
A radical simplification of the gift aid system
A wider examination of the tax system to incentivise giving and philanthropy

The umbrella body also promises to work with other support bodies and VCOs, saying it recognises that existing support services “could be rationalised to become more efficient, effective and sustainable”.

This comes is response to the government’s stated desire to improve the effectiveness of infrastructure to support frontline organisations, a consultation upon which is pending.

Directory: National Council of Voluntary Organisations (NCVO)

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Name *

Email *

Organisation

Job Title

Comments *

Verification *

* Please read our Community Standards

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

Robust but respectful debate
Strongly held opinions
Intelligent relevant discussion
The sharing of relevant experiences
New participants

We will not publish:

Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
The posting of contact details for yourself or others
Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.