Share

Tomorrow's People compromised political neutrality in Tory manifesto, says Charity Commission

Tomorrow's People compromised political neutrality in Tory manifesto, says Charity Commission
News

Tomorrow's People compromised political neutrality in Tory manifesto, says Charity Commission

Governance | Niki May Young | 16 Aug 2010

The Charity Commission has concluded that Tomorrow’s People adversely affected its independence and political neutrality by submitting comments to the Conservative Party which were then included in the party’s manifesto before the election in May.

Under charity law the support of a political party is not permitted. Publishing its regulatory case report into the perceived partiality of the educational charity the Commission advised: "Appearing in the party’s manifesto called the charity’s independence into question because it can be seen to be an endorsement of the wider policies of the party and consequently the party itself.

"The report reminds other charities and their trustees that charities must remain independent from party politics and cannot give support to a political party, politician or candidate.

"During an election period, the need for impartiality and balance is intensified, and charities must take particular care when undertaking any activities in the political arena to ensure that the charity’s independence is maintained and that there is no perception that its independence is being adversely affected by the charity’s activities."

Comments altered and promoted

A concern was raised with the Commission on 19 April regarding comments made by Tomorrow’s People chief executive Debbie Scott and published in the Conservative manifesto.

Scott had offered to submit comments to all political parties in the lead-up to the election about the parties' welfare-to-work policies but only the Conservative Party took the charity up on the offer.

Tomorrow's People advised the Commission that its comments had been altered and given unexpected prominence and that the charity was not given the opportunity to comment or sign off the comments before their publication. However, after reviewing both the submitted and the printed versions, the Commission concluded that “both the submitted and published versions of the chief executive’s comments favourably compared the charity’s view on welfare-to-work strategies with the party’s single Work Programme policy.”

Tomorrow’s People receives 84 per cent of its £7,981,000 income from regional government offices, local authorities and the London Development Agency.

While the Commission advised that “it is clear from our engagement with the charity, that in agreeing to contribute to the manifesto, it was not the charity’s intention to provide or encourage support for the party,” the steps taken, however, “were insufficient to protect the charity’s reputation and independence from party politics. As such, the perception of the charity’s independence and political neutrality has been adversely affected.”

Penelope Wright, lawyer at Thomas Eggar LLP, commented: "This case illustrates how difficult it can be for charity trustees to remain impartial, when circumstances politicise an issue on which the charity already campaigns.

"Although charities are permitted to campaign on issues that directly affect their objects, they are not allowed to appear to favour a particular party. Trustees can very quickly find themselves in difficulties when politicians get involved in the charity's area of interest, especially during election campaigns. It is crucial for trustees to familiarise themselves with the law on charities' permitted political activity, and with the Charity Commission's guidance note on the subject."

The Commission has provided Tomorrow's People with the advice and guidance necessary to comply with its legal and regulatory requirements.

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

emailalert

Tribunal upholds Commission's merger decision but orders changes

24 May 2012

The Charity Tribunal has upheld the Charity Commission’s decision to allow two independent schools in...

Tender is issued for £200m National Citizen Service contracts

24 May 2012

The Department for Education has issued an invitation to tender for delivery of the National Citizen Service...

Trustees 'should be free to seek total return investments without approval'

24 May 2012

The Charity Law Association has recommended trustees are given the legal freedom to invest on a total...

Philanthropy in higher education consultation looks at collaboration with wider charity sector

25 May 2012

The Higher Education Funding Council for England has hinted at the possibility of collaboration with the...

Esmée Fairbairn: applications to trusts and foundations remain stable

25 May 2012

The Esmée Fairbairn Foundation is surprised not to have been inundated with applications for funding...

Charities in Twitter storm over balloon releases

24 May 2012

Charities are being urged to abandon balloon releases in a Twitter a campaign.

Charities express concerns over cookie compliance

25 May 2012

From tomorrow the Information Commissioner’s Office will enforce the law requiring all websites to inform...

Charities in Twitter storm over balloon releases

24 May 2012

Charities are being urged to abandon balloon releases in a Twitter a campaign.

Missing People plans to use Twitter to find child runaways

24 May 2012

Missing People is hoping to track down missing children using Twitter.

Join the discussion

Twitter
 
Training

Attending our one day courses is a highly effective way of ensuring new and existing trustees fully understand their role, responsibilities and liabilities.

>> Find out more <<