Report issues damning critique of NTS governance

Governance | Gareth Jones | 9 Aug 2010

The National Trust for Scotland has promised to “drive forward an ambitious programme of change” after the final report of its independent strategic review outlined a range of governance and strategic criticisms.

The report argues that the Trust “is gridlocked by its governance structures”, and calls for its 87 trustees and 100 non-executives on panels and committees to be replaced by a board of 15.

Led by former presiding officer of the Scottish Parliament George Reid (pictured), the review also includes the revelation that the Trust does not hold an inventory of what it owns.

It adds: “The Trust is not sustainable as presently organised. It balances its books by using legacies as ready income, by selling assets, and by delaying project work.

“It has no complete record, in a single data base or document, of what it owns. There is no strategic plan. The current budget was prepared on a needs-must basis only.”

Responding to the report, chief executive Kate Mavor said: “George Reid and his review team have correctly identified that the Trust has been heavily over-governed for far too long and that its management has been held back through the existence of such a top-heavy structure.

“For our part we firmly believe the reforms to the governance of the charity can be introduced within the timescale set.

“We also believe change is essential to take the National Trust for Scotland forward and meet the important conservation challenges ahead.”

“Poorly led for some time”

A spokesman for In Trust for Scotland, the campaigning group set up by dissatisfied NTS members, welcomed Reid’s report, but added:

“His revelation that the Trust had no complete inventory of its properties and moveable assets comes as a shock but no surprise in an organisation which had been poorly led for some time.

“We note the commitment of the chief executive to rectify this as part of a long overdue thorough audit. Members and volunteers continue to be concerned about the whereabouts of assets at certain properties.”

Directory: National Trust for Scotland

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Name *

Email *

Organisation

Job Title

Comments *

Verification *

* Please read our Community Standards

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

Robust but respectful debate
Strongly held opinions
Intelligent relevant discussion
The sharing of relevant experiences
New participants

We will not publish:

Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
The posting of contact details for yourself or others
Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.