Share

Bubb refuses to accept Office of Civil Society rebrand

Bubb refuses to accept Office of Civil Society rebrand
News

Bubb refuses to accept Office of Civil Society rebrand2

Governance | Tania Mason | 18 May 2010

Acevo chief executive Stephen Bubb has vowed to ignore the fact that the government has ditched the Office of the Third Sector in favour of the Office for Civil Society, and intends to continue to use the ‘third sector’ moniker in  references to the new minister and his office.

Bubb (pictured) made the assertion in his blog titled 'What's in a name?' yesterday, declaring that the Office's change of name was just “a fad”.

“Civil society – what is that exactly?” he queried. “An organisation dedicated to promoting better manners?

“I would have thought there were somewhat more important things to do than spending money on rebranding?

Acevo will remain third sector and as we uphold our national traditions we will continue to use OTS and the third sector minister as our nom de plume for these institutions.”

Acevo’s strapline is ‘Third sector leaders’.

Bubb also wrote: “Will ‘civil society’ go the way of ‘Big Society’ I wonder – a term no longer to be heard in Tory high command. There is a lesson here for politicians who waste time on names and other such ephemera." 

Acevo’s press office, asked whether Bubb’s stated refusal to use the names ‘Office of Civil Society’ and ‘minister for civil society’ was official Acevo policy, described his remarks as "jocular" and added: "Acevo has been referring to the sector as the 'third sector' since long before the OTS was established.

"Clearly it is up to government to decide what they want to call themselves and equally it's up to us what we want to call ourselves and refer to our colleagues in the sector as."

Etherington welcomes new name

NCVO chief executive Stuart Etherington, on the other hand, was very happy about the rebrand. Etherington has long been a vocal advocate of the term ‘civil society’ and the NCVO’s annual state-of-the-sector research report changed from Voluntary Sector Almanac to Civil Society Almanac last year.

Etherington told Civil Society he was “delighted that the government has recognised the wider contribution of civil society” in its shaping of the ministerial office.

"Many may mock this new term – civil society," he said. "But it has real value.  Civil society is driven by people themselves, by their concerns and their passions. It is where people come together to make a positive difference to their lives, and the lives of others. 

"It provides an important counterbalance to the power of the state and the power of the market.  It gives a positive definition of the role of charities and voluntary and community organisations, rather than defining us in relation to others, or by what we are not."

Charities Aid Foundation was also pleased. Hannah Terrey, head of policy and public affairs, said: “Never before have we seen a government put the role of civil society so high on its agenda.

"It’s very encouraging to see that, within its first two weeks, the coalition government has already begun to put into action its plans for a Big Society.  Charities, community groups and social enterprises all have vast experience of working to improve communities and it is vital that the government draws on this expertise."

Kevin Curley, CEO of Navca, however, said his organisation had decided not to use either 'civil society' or 'third sector', reverting instead to 'voluntary and community action' - "because that's the language our members use".

Philip Anthony
Director
Co-Operative Systems
19 May 2010

Stephen Bubb is entitled to his opinion, but in representing the sector or indeed those working in the civil society, such "jocular" comments will not help get the constructive engagement needed in these difficult economic times.
Stevie, I wouldnt wait by phone for Dave to call (just joking ;)

Ian Stewart
Director
str
19 May 2010

Don't be such a clown

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

Oxfam International to move headquarters to Nairobi

26 Jul 2016

Oxfam International has announced that it will move the Oxfam International Secretariat from Oxford, where...

JustGiving pays £1.6m reclaimed gift aid to thousands of charities after updated HMRC guidance

25 Jul 2016

Charities that lost out on gift aid payments because donations on JustGiving included messages of support...

Report: UK banks are lending £3bn to social organisations

22 Jul 2016

A report commissioned by RBS has estimated that banks in the UK have over £3bn invested in outstanding...

Macmillan holds onto top spot in charity brand index mid-year ranking

26 Jul 2016

Macmillan Cancer Support has come top of the mid-year rankings for YouGov’s charity brand index, which...

No date set for PFRA to agree merger with IoF as deadline looms

26 Jul 2016

A date for the PFRA’s Extraordinary General Meeting at which members will vote on the organisation’s...

Fundraising Regulator should seek government funding, says consultation response

25 Jul 2016

The Directory of Social change has called for the Fundraising Regulator to seek a “statutory grant to...

Blockchain technology could ‘revolutionise’ charity regulation, says report

21 Jul 2016

Blockchain technology could eventually be used to carry out many of the functions of a traditional regulator,...

Macmillan, Cancer Research UK and Brooke use Pokemon Go to encourage fundraising

14 Jul 2016

Macmillan Cancer Support, Cancer Research UK and Brooke are among the charities to encourage fundraising...

Stop looking for a 'big bang' moment for digital transformation

4 Jul 2016

Charities should stop looking for a “big bang” moment in digital transformation and instead focus...

Join the discussion

Twitter
 
Training

Attending our one day courses is a highly effective way of ensuring new and existing trustees fully understand their role, responsibilities and liabilities.

>> Find out more <<