Share

Bubb refuses to accept Office of Civil Society rebrand

Bubb refuses to accept Office of Civil Society rebrand
News

Bubb refuses to accept Office of Civil Society rebrand2

Governance | Tania Mason | 18 May 2010

Acevo chief executive Stephen Bubb has vowed to ignore the fact that the government has ditched the Office of the Third Sector in favour of the Office for Civil Society, and intends to continue to use the ‘third sector’ moniker in  references to the new minister and his office.

Bubb (pictured) made the assertion in his blog titled 'What's in a name?' yesterday, declaring that the Office's change of name was just “a fad”.

“Civil society – what is that exactly?” he queried. “An organisation dedicated to promoting better manners?

“I would have thought there were somewhat more important things to do than spending money on rebranding?

Acevo will remain third sector and as we uphold our national traditions we will continue to use OTS and the third sector minister as our nom de plume for these institutions.”

Acevo’s strapline is ‘Third sector leaders’.

Bubb also wrote: “Will ‘civil society’ go the way of ‘Big Society’ I wonder – a term no longer to be heard in Tory high command. There is a lesson here for politicians who waste time on names and other such ephemera." 

Acevo’s press office, asked whether Bubb’s stated refusal to use the names ‘Office of Civil Society’ and ‘minister for civil society’ was official Acevo policy, described his remarks as "jocular" and added: "Acevo has been referring to the sector as the 'third sector' since long before the OTS was established.

"Clearly it is up to government to decide what they want to call themselves and equally it's up to us what we want to call ourselves and refer to our colleagues in the sector as."

Etherington welcomes new name

NCVO chief executive Stuart Etherington, on the other hand, was very happy about the rebrand. Etherington has long been a vocal advocate of the term ‘civil society’ and the NCVO’s annual state-of-the-sector research report changed from Voluntary Sector Almanac to Civil Society Almanac last year.

Etherington told Civil Society he was “delighted that the government has recognised the wider contribution of civil society” in its shaping of the ministerial office.

"Many may mock this new term – civil society," he said. "But it has real value.  Civil society is driven by people themselves, by their concerns and their passions. It is where people come together to make a positive difference to their lives, and the lives of others. 

"It provides an important counterbalance to the power of the state and the power of the market.  It gives a positive definition of the role of charities and voluntary and community organisations, rather than defining us in relation to others, or by what we are not."

Charities Aid Foundation was also pleased. Hannah Terrey, head of policy and public affairs, said: “Never before have we seen a government put the role of civil society so high on its agenda.

"It’s very encouraging to see that, within its first two weeks, the coalition government has already begun to put into action its plans for a Big Society.  Charities, community groups and social enterprises all have vast experience of working to improve communities and it is vital that the government draws on this expertise."

Kevin Curley, CEO of Navca, however, said his organisation had decided not to use either 'civil society' or 'third sector', reverting instead to 'voluntary and community action' - "because that's the language our members use".

Philip Anthony
Director
Co-Operative Systems
19 May 2010

Stephen Bubb is entitled to his opinion, but in representing the sector or indeed those working in the civil society, such "jocular" comments will not help get the constructive engagement needed in these difficult economic times.
Stevie, I wouldnt wait by phone for Dave to call (just joking ;)

Ian Stewart
Director
str
19 May 2010

Don't be such a clown

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

Citizen’s Advice Scotland denies report it is ‘on the brink of collapse’

24 May 2016

Citizen’s Advice Scotland has denied reports it is “on the brink of collapse”, following allegations...

Oxfam accused of using gift aid for tax avoidance

23 May 2016

Gift aid is used by Oxfam and other charities as a form of tax avoidance, according to an article published...

Regulators outline plans to require professional advisers to report on more matters

19 May 2016

The three UK charity regulators have opened a joint consultation on a revised list of “significant matters”...

Report: 'Lotteries outperform door-to-door and face-to-face on attrition'

25 May 2016

Direct debit lotteries are performing “much better in terms of attrition” than door to door and private...

National Lottery raised £1.9bn for good causes last year, says Camelot

24 May 2016

Sales from the National Lottery hit a record of £7.6bn in 2015/16, with £1.9bn going to good causes,...

Government-backed fundraising platform gave more than £170,000 to trustee's companies

24 May 2016

A charity given government backing to run a fundraising platform paid half its income last year to its...

Facebook looking to make ‘donate’ button available to UK charities this year

23 May 2016

Facebook is looking to roll-out its ‘donate’ button feature to all charity pages at some point this...

Blue Cross, Mary's Meals and Barbican start to fundraise with contactless technology

20 May 2016

The Blue Cross, Mary’s Meals and the Barbican are the latest charities to trial the use of contactless...

Charities need to address digital skills gap or they will lose beneficiaries

6 May 2016

Charities must improve their digital offering or lose beneficiaries, the chief executive of Parkinson’s...

Join the discussion

Twitter
 
Training

Attending our one day courses is a highly effective way of ensuring new and existing trustees fully understand their role, responsibilities and liabilities.

>> Find out more <<