Environmental responsibility may be added to Commission's trustee hallmarks

Governance | Gareth Jones | 27 Jan 2010

The Charity Commission is to consider adding a new good practice standard to its Hallmarks of an Effective Trustee, which will promote environmental responsibility among charities.

At the request of the ministerial third sector task force on climate change, board members were presented with a paper earlier today suggesting how the Commission could make a recommendation on “environmental responsibility, sustainability and action to tackle climate change”.

The paper says that “as a minimum” and without consultation the following paragraph could be added to Hallmark 3: Fit for Purpose: “The charity considers ways in which it can take an environmentally responsible approach to its work which is consistent with its purposes, even when its purposes are not specifically related to the environment”.

It further suggests that the Commission could informally consult umbrella bodies and other relevant organisations on adding a line arguing charities should consider how they can tackle the environment through their work, even when their purposes are not directly related to the environment.

It also suggests that the Essential Trustee (CC3) guidance could have a similar emphasis, to be added when it is next updated.

In support, the paper cites the Commission’s Going Green research, which found in December 2008 that charities need a more corporate approach, as “it is often one or two more motivated individuals who champion good practice rather than it being seen as a whole-organisation responsibility”.

Directory: Charity Commission

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Name *

Email *

Organisation

Job Title

Comments *

Verification *

* Please read our Community Standards

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

Robust but respectful debate
Strongly held opinions
Intelligent relevant discussion
The sharing of relevant experiences
New participants

We will not publish:

Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
The posting of contact details for yourself or others
Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.