Share

Commission: voluntary exit programme is good value for money

Charity Commission in Liverpool
News

Commission: voluntary exit programme is good value for money1

Governance | Tania Mason | 11 Jul 2013

The Charity Commission has defended its voluntary redundancy scheme as good value for money for the taxpayer, insisting that it has already paid for itself and will deliver further savings of £4m a year going forward.

Earlier this week civilsociety.co.uk reported that the £4.3m cost of making 129 people redundant between January 2011 and March 2013 had so far delivered just £3.3m in savings to the Commission’s wage bill.

But the Commission has pointed out that if the social security and pension costs of those employees are taken into account, the saving rises to £4.2m, just short of the £4.3m cost of the severance packages.

A spokeswoman for the Commission also added that the regulator expects a further £4m in savings will accrue each year from now as a result of the job cuts, so it is confident that this represents “good value for money for the taxpayer”.

Size of payments 'like banking sector'

The regulator also sought to defend the size of the severance packages agreed, after some readers of Tuesday's story were aghast at the amount of some of them.

In the same week that the BBC and the NHS have come under fire for their redundancy programmes, the Commission revealed that one of its severance payments was in the range £150,000-200,000; three were between £100,000 and £150,000, and 26 ex-employees were given payments of between £50,000 and £100,000.

Social entrepreneur Sally Smith commented that statutory redundancy pay would be between 0.5 and 1.5 weeks pay for every year worked, dependent on age, so the Charity Commission's average redundancy payment of £33,000 across all 129 employees would equate to the average employee working for 20 years on a final salary of £85,000.

"Why in times of austerity and dramatic cuts have the Charity Commission been so very generous in their redundancy payouts?" she said.

Steve Edwards described the amounts as "ludicrously excessive" and "more like the kind of redundancy payments that you would expect in the banking sector".

Commission: Many staff gave long service

In response to a question from civilsociety.co.uk about how many of the severance packages exceeded the statutory minimum, the Commission spokeswoman said that the statutory redundancy scheme does not apply to civil servants.

Instead, all civil service exits are governed and calculated in line with the Civil Service Compensation Scheme (CSCS),  which sets out the level of compensation that departments can pay their staff if they leave under voluntary or compulsory redundancy.

"None of the package payments went beyond the terms of the CSCS," the spokeswoman said. "Many of our staff have given very long service; this is why some of the awards were quite significant."

T Bigden
DAVSS
11 Jul 2013

Another ghastly incidence of one rule for "us" and another for "them".

How long will it take for all of the "redundant" people to be taken back on an agency basis as self employed hires / consultants etc.

The nepotism and self serving character of the Civil Service is disgusting. One notes the report just out that so many in the NHS made redundant in one authority have been taken on in another. Revolving doors going so fast that they make you giddy!

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

Free eNews

CTG attacks HMRC for breaking promises over implementation of 20 per cent tax on direct mail

16 Apr 2015

Charities have been left unsure how to obey tax rules after HM Revenue & Customs failed to publish...

NCVO and CFG express concerns over government review of business rates

13 Apr 2015

Infrastructure bodies including NCVO and the Charity Finance Group are consulting charities over a government...

Grant-makers face 'big decisions' as a result of 'seismic shift' in commissioning, says report

9 Apr 2015

Charities and funders face big decisions after a “seismic shift” in public service commissioning,...

Colin Lloyd, founding chair of FRSB, to step down after nine years

20 Apr 2015

Colin Lloyd, chair of the FRSB, will step down in June after three terms in the role, beginning at the...

£1m raised for charities by carrier bag charge in Scotland

20 Apr 2015

More than £1m has been raised for charities from the carrier bag charge since it was introduced six months...

Study finds that men donate more to charity when the fundraiser is an attractive female

17 Apr 2015

Men donate more to online fundraising pages where the fundraiser is an attractive female, and donate competitively...

Oxfam trials tap-to-donate technology

17 Apr 2015

Oxfam GB is running a trial of near-field communication technology to allow supporters to both donate...

Ice Bucket Challenge effect brings down average online donation amount

15 Apr 2015

The average online donation fell by 8.6 per cent in 2014 to £63.69, according to a survey by fundraising...

Education charity UCAS broke electronic marketing rules, says Information Commissioner

9 Apr 2015

The Universities and Colleges Admissions Service broke electronic marketing rules because its admission...

Join the discussion

Twitter
 
Training

Attending our one day courses is a highly effective way of ensuring new and existing trustees fully understand their role, responsibilities and liabilities.

>> Find out more <<