Charity Commission inquiries taking twice as long as three years ago

Governance | Niki May Young | 29 Oct 2012

The average duration of Charity Commission statutory inquiries which ended in 2011/12 was 715 days, twice as long as those closed in 2008/09.

Statutory inquiries that closed in 2008/09 had been open for an average of 358 days, but this duration crept up the next year to 395 days, and in the past two years has increased sharply to 715 days.

The number of statutory inquiries closed annually during that time period has decreased from 21 to nine, while the number of statutory inquiries opened annually has dropped from 19 to 12. The number of non-statutory inquiries opened has also dropped sharply from 168 to 54, and the number closed annually has dropped from 188 to 85.

A spokeswoman for the Commission advised that the main reason for the increase in duration for completing statutory inquiries was that "cases we closed in 2011/12 included several very complex cases, which involved interventions by other regulators and law enforcement agencies".

"We always aim to conclude cases as quickly as possible but the timescales will vary depending on the complexity of each case," she said.

This explanation appeared to be at odds with the Commission's own figures in its recently-published Back on Track report, which states that none of the statutory inquiries which closed in 2011/12 had significant involvement from other regulators.

The "Number of statutory inquiries closed which had significant involvement from other regulators" was zero, it states.

However, responding to civilsociety.co.uk's enquiry about this discrepancy, the spokeswoman advised that this figure relates to the number of statutory investigations which had to be halted during the investigation due to the involvement of regulators, such as the police.

While none fell into this bracket, she said, a number of statutory inquiries that closed in 2011/12 did involve other regulators, and were complex, she asserted.

Directory: Charity Commission

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Name *

Email *

Organisation

Job Title

Comments *

Verification *

* Please read our Community Standards

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

Robust but respectful debate
Strongly held opinions
Intelligent relevant discussion
The sharing of relevant experiences
New participants

We will not publish:

Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
The posting of contact details for yourself or others
Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.