Share

Partnerships should focus on service, not finance, says report

Partnerships should focus on service, not finance, says report
News

Partnerships should focus on service, not finance, says report

Governance | Jonathan Last | 19 Oct 2012

A Third Sector Research Centre report has warned that a fixation on financial efficiency often leads to charities losing sight of their social effectiveness obligation when entering into partnerships.

The report entitled Partnership Working, which is released today, is based on research studying partnerships with and between voluntary sector organisations to deliver public services.

It finds that both service commissioning and partnerships are often driven by a fixation with ‘economies of scale’ (cost reductions gained through expansion) rather than developing the personal relationships that can mean better outcomes for service users.

Economies of scope

TSRC argues in its report that more attention could be paid to ‘economies of scope’, wherein organisations increase the range, rather than volume of their activities. Such relationship-orientated activities include customer empathy, team-working, and partnership-building, and TSRC found that these are often also undervalued by commissioning frameworks.

The report found benefits of partnerships were sometimes limited and hard to generalise. It suggests that the pros and cons of such a move be weighed up on a case-by-case basis, rather than justified by broad notions of ‘efficiency’, ‘joined-up services’ and ‘economies of scale’. 

The research was based on five case studies of organisations involved in public service delivery in different policy fields including housing, welfare, and employment services, preceded by a period of scoping research with national interviewees.

Among the conclusions it draws are that service users should get more of a say in the establishment of partnerships, and that voluntary partnerships are more successful than those that are mandated or enforced, since they emerge organically from trust-based relationships.

TSRC’s James Rees conducted the research with David Mullins and Tony Bovaird, and said: “The private sector may be better at doing some types of partnerships because of the single bottom line, but public services deliver multiple bottom lines.

“Trust, user engagement, co-production and relationship approaches are needed to deliver value in these spheres.”

Today's report builds on an earlier TSRC literature review, Working Paper 60.

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

Free eNews

Crime prevention charity will challenge rate relief decision

17 May 2013

The Public Safety Charitable Trust plans to appeal this week’s High Court ruling that it cannot claim...

Centre for Social Impact Bonds launches new tools

17 May 2013

The Cabinet Office’s Centre for Social Impact Bonds has developed two new tools to assist the development...

New Sorp cleared for sector consultation

17 May 2013

The Financial Reporting Council, which oversees financial reporting in the UK and Ireland, yesterday agreed...

Commission criticises DfID unrestricted funding programme

17 May 2013

The Independent Commission for Aid Impact has called on the Department for International Development to...

National Lottery income hits £7bn in another record year

16 May 2013

The National Lottery turned over just shy of £7bn last financial year, another record year for the operator...

Ministry of Justice rejects proposals to regulate will-writing

16 May 2013

The government has rejected the Legal Services Board’s recommendation that will-writing should be regulated...

Sector needs a 'data manifesto', says leadership review

17 May 2013

The voluntary sector should create a “data manifesto” that identifies who holds data about the sector...

Charity governance is stuck in the past, finds leadership review

16 May 2013

While management in the charity sector has changed significantly in the past few decades, a reluctance...

Your picks of the week

13 May 2013

Your CivilSociety rounds-up the most read stories from the previous week.

Join the discussion

Twitter
 
Training

Attending our one day courses is a highly effective way of ensuring new and existing trustees fully understand their role, responsibilities and liabilities.

>> Find out more <<