Crime prevention charity will challenge rate relief decision
17 May 2013
The Public Safety Charitable Trust plans to appeal this week’s High Court ruling that it cannot claim...
Sorry for interrupting, but there is something we need to tell you...
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website.
If you wish to restrict or block web browser cookies which are set on your device then you can do this through your browser settings, the Help function within your browser will tell you how.
A Third Sector Research Centre report has warned that a fixation on financial efficiency often leads to charities losing sight of their social effectiveness obligation when entering into partnerships.
The report entitled Partnership Working, which is released today, is based on research studying partnerships with and between voluntary sector organisations to deliver public services.
It finds that both service commissioning and partnerships are often driven by a fixation with ‘economies of scale’ (cost reductions gained through expansion) rather than developing the personal relationships that can mean better outcomes for service users.
TSRC argues in its report that more attention could be paid to ‘economies of scope’, wherein organisations increase the range, rather than volume of their activities. Such relationship-orientated activities include customer empathy, team-working, and partnership-building, and TSRC found that these are often also undervalued by commissioning frameworks.
The report found benefits of partnerships were sometimes limited and hard to generalise. It suggests that the pros and cons of such a move be weighed up on a case-by-case basis, rather than justified by broad notions of ‘efficiency’, ‘joined-up services’ and ‘economies of scale’.
The research was based on five case studies of organisations involved in public service delivery in different policy fields including housing, welfare, and employment services, preceded by a period of scoping research with national interviewees.
Among the conclusions it draws are that service users should get more of a say in the establishment of partnerships, and that voluntary partnerships are more successful than those that are mandated or enforced, since they emerge organically from trust-based relationships.
TSRC’s James Rees conducted the research with David Mullins and Tony Bovaird, and said: “The private sector may be better at doing some types of partnerships because of the single bottom line, but public services deliver multiple bottom lines.
“Trust, user engagement, co-production and relationship approaches are needed to deliver value in these spheres.”
Today's report builds on an earlier TSRC literature review, Working Paper 60.
17 May 2013
The Public Safety Charitable Trust plans to appeal this week’s High Court ruling that it cannot claim...
17 May 2013
The Cabinet Office’s Centre for Social Impact Bonds has developed two new tools to assist the development...
17 May 2013
The Financial Reporting Council, which oversees financial reporting in the UK and Ireland, yesterday agreed...
17 May 2013
The Independent Commission for Aid Impact has called on the Department for International Development to...
16 May 2013
The National Lottery turned over just shy of £7bn last financial year, another record year for the operator...
16 May 2013
The government has rejected the Legal Services Board’s recommendation that will-writing should be regulated...
17 May 2013
The voluntary sector should create a “data manifesto” that identifies who holds data about the sector...
16 May 2013
While management in the charity sector has changed significantly in the past few decades, a reluctance...
13 May 2013
Your CivilSociety rounds-up the most read stories from the previous week.

Attending our one day courses is a highly effective way of ensuring new and existing trustees fully understand their role, responsibilities and liabilities.