Share

25-year-old charity closes, blaming the Work Programme

Red Kite Learning Annual Review
News

25-year-old charity closes, blaming the Work Programme5

Governance | Tania Mason | 25 Jul 2012

Red Kite Learning, a 25-year-old London-based education and employment charity, is closing at the end of July because it says government policies such as the Work Programme has made its future untenable.

Founder and CEO Brendan Tarring says the government’s fixation on cost over quality is “destroying” the welfare-to-work sector, particularly those mid-sized charities in the “squeezed middle”.  Thirty-two jobs will be lost.

Since 1988 Red Kite Learning has supported more than 130,000 unemployed people, providing training, finding them work experience and helping them find jobs. A recent impact assessment of five years’ work with drug and alcohol users suggested that the charity delivers just under £2 worth of benefit to the Exchequer for every £1 it receives in funding.

But now Tarring says that the Work Programme, where contracted organisations are only paid once people are placed in jobs, cannot sustain medium-sized charities. In 2010 the charity had income of £2.8m, but in its current financial year, which was due to end in September, income was projected to be £1.3m.

Tarring doubts that the Work Programme will meet its targets for getting long-term unemployed people back to work, and that the one-size-fits-all model will ultimately fail.

He said: “The government’s fixation on cuts and awarding contracts on cost rather than quality is destroying the most sophisticated not-for-profit sector in the world.

“Our model has always been to work with as many funders as possible. We had a whole series of smaller contracts with local authorities and Jobcentre Plus and that would have worked if we had been able to pick up a couple of larger contracts, say with the Skills Funding Agency and the Work Programme.”

But despite the charity’s successful track record, it cannot bid for larger contracts such as these because of the minimum contract values and the time lag between starting work and receiving payment.

Six months before payment is received

Last autumn Red Kite was offered the chance to manage a Families Programme, which is linked to the Work Programme, in north London, but it has found that it can’t sustain it.

Tarring said: “Because of the funding arrangements, where we don’t pick up income until six months after we’ve begun work with any individual, it became part of the overall consideration of our prospects for the future.

“That’s a level of credit that I don’t think many charities are equipped to handle.

“Our conclusion has been there is no place for Red Kite Learning in this environment.”

Monoculture of support

He went on: “It’s very sad as I think a charity like mine has a great deal to offer the back-to-work sector.  The policies in place at the moment suggest the government is deliberately trying to whittle down the number of providers to a handful of very large, long-term providers and I don’t think it is going to leave the sector with enough diversity to meet the needs of all the individuals who find themselves unemployed.

“We’re in danger of producing a monoculture of support for the unemployed when what they need is a diversity of options.”

Red Kite Learning is now planning to hand back its contracts with London Councils and DWP, as well as its pre-existing contracts for local learning and employment work.

The decision to wind up was taken in May.

David Weatherhead
CEO
CMDA
26 Jul 2012

Unfortunately this is just the tip of the iceberg. Many charities rely on government contracts to support the other work they do. Over the last few years the government are awarding large contracts to big organisations who take a cut and pass it down. who then take a cut and pass it down. You get the picture?
Smaller charities cannot apply as the levels of the whole contract are to big. We have tried joint ventures but get nowhere.
At the end of the day the bulk of money is creamed off before it hits where its needed

Jonathan Cohen
Managing Director
Third Sector Alliance
26 Jul 2012

Although I don't wish to duplicate some of the points already raised, this is another tragic example of the (negative) impact that the Work Programme has on well established charities with a proven track record of hitting targets and benefiting tens of thousands of people. The Governments initiative is frankly not sustainable for the long run, because they will be turning back to charities (similar to Red Kite Learning) for their support.

Bernadette Conlon
CEO
Start in Salford
25 Jul 2012

I just wanted to say how sad I am to hear that Red Kite Learning are being forced to take this decision due to the unrealistic ideas around Work programmes and employment of the most vulerable members of society. I run an arts and wellebing charity/social enterprise in Salford, Manchester and are dealing with the same issues and problems that Red Kite are facing although our main function is not employment this is something we do deal with. As usual most people do not realise or understand what is being rolled out in both the welfare sector and the NHS until it is to late and the damage is done.
Although I have not worked with Red Kite myself being in the 3rd sector I understand the hard work that goes on. I would like to thank Brendan and all his workers for all their hard work and committemnt over the years and hope that things will work out for all of you.

Bardro
25 Jul 2012

Very sad story indeed.
But - as an advocate of the devil - I have to highlight the fact that governemnt's contracts are not created to support he sector. They are designed to support as many people by as small cost as possible, partially because we (taxpayers) are paying for it.
Sad part is that charities do exist to offer very tailored support to users, very often this support is 'ineffective' in normel sense of this word as users come back againa and again for years so formally there's no imporvement whatsoever. But users do need this on-going support more than 'effective' one-off help. Tough call.
But then, charities are allowed and encouraged to solicit support from the society itself and I appreciate the level of exasperation of trustees who decide that their mission cannot be continued without goverment money. I don't think it's right - this way in few years time there shouldn't be even one charity and we all expect that the sector will in fact develop. An appeal to trustees: think before you close charity business due to government cuts - you are for people, not for government.

Mike Day
IT Trainer
Red Kite Learning
25 Jul 2012

I have worked in this sector for 19 years, including 3 sessions with Red Kite, the last lasting 10 years to the week. One may have got used to regular redundancies due to changes of government policies just as programmes became successful (Charity Action in 2001, Dependency 2 Work 2005) and another trendily named programme was launched by a new ministerial team, but this change is toxic and has been fatal to many small charities and community based businesses.
When the policy was announced (quietly) someone estimated 700 charities could go. I thought this was sensalitist reaction. Two years later my job, where I helped adults get work-related IT qualifications, hit my contract targets every year for 4 out of 5 years, is gone.
The Big Society? Only for big companies where the bosses get millons in pay.

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

Free eNews

Equinox staff set to strike over proposed pay cuts

23 May 2013

Unite members at Equinox Care have voted for two days of strike action over proposed pay cuts of up to...

Big Society Network's 2012 accounts show £180k deficit

23 May 2013

Big Society Network has finally filed its 2012 accounts with Companies House, nearly five months late,...

Finance is a matter for all small charity trustees, report advises

23 May 2013

There is a lack of financial capability on small charity trustee boards with many organisations leaving...

Shadow minister wades in to Big Society Network funding controversy

22 May 2013

Shadow minister for civil society Gareth Thomas has tabled a series of Parliamentary questions to minister...

National abuse charity told it will not receive Jimmy Savile Trust funds

22 May 2013

The trustees of the Jimmy Savile Charitable Trust are not donating any funds to the National Association...

Commission moots indicating FRSB membership on charity register

22 May 2013

Charities’ membership or non-membership of the Fundraising Standards Board could be included on the...

Age UK and London Zoo on shortlist for £2m Google charity competition

22 May 2013

Google has shortlisted ten UK charities which stand the chance of winning £500,000 as part of its Global...

Your picks of the week

20 May 2013

Your CivilSociety rounds-up the most read stories from the previous week.

Sector needs a 'data manifesto', says leadership review

17 May 2013

The voluntary sector should create a “data manifesto” that identifies who holds data about the sector...

Join the discussion

Twitter
 
Training

Attending our one day courses is a highly effective way of ensuring new and existing trustees fully understand their role, responsibilities and liabilities.

>> Find out more <<