Equinox staff set to strike over proposed pay cuts
23 May 2013
Unite members at Equinox Care have voted for two days of strike action over proposed pay cuts of up to...
Sorry for interrupting, but there is something we need to tell you...
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website.
If you wish to restrict or block web browser cookies which are set on your device then you can do this through your browser settings, the Help function within your browser will tell you how.
Red Kite Learning, a 25-year-old London-based education and employment charity, is closing at the end of July because it says government policies such as the Work Programme has made its future untenable.
Founder and CEO Brendan Tarring says the government’s fixation on cost over quality is “destroying” the welfare-to-work sector, particularly those mid-sized charities in the “squeezed middle”. Thirty-two jobs will be lost.
Since 1988 Red Kite Learning has supported more than 130,000 unemployed people, providing training, finding them work experience and helping them find jobs. A recent impact assessment of five years’ work with drug and alcohol users suggested that the charity delivers just under £2 worth of benefit to the Exchequer for every £1 it receives in funding.
But now Tarring says that the Work Programme, where contracted organisations are only paid once people are placed in jobs, cannot sustain medium-sized charities. In 2010 the charity had income of £2.8m, but in its current financial year, which was due to end in September, income was projected to be £1.3m.
Tarring doubts that the Work Programme will meet its targets for getting long-term unemployed people back to work, and that the one-size-fits-all model will ultimately fail.
He said: “The government’s fixation on cuts and awarding contracts on cost rather than quality is destroying the most sophisticated not-for-profit sector in the world.
“Our model has always been to work with as many funders as possible. We had a whole series of smaller contracts with local authorities and Jobcentre Plus and that would have worked if we had been able to pick up a couple of larger contracts, say with the Skills Funding Agency and the Work Programme.”
But despite the charity’s successful track record, it cannot bid for larger contracts such as these because of the minimum contract values and the time lag between starting work and receiving payment.
Last autumn Red Kite was offered the chance to manage a Families Programme, which is linked to the Work Programme, in north London, but it has found that it can’t sustain it.
Tarring said: “Because of the funding arrangements, where we don’t pick up income until six months after we’ve begun work with any individual, it became part of the overall consideration of our prospects for the future.
“That’s a level of credit that I don’t think many charities are equipped to handle.
“Our conclusion has been there is no place for Red Kite Learning in this environment.”
He went on: “It’s very sad as I think a charity like mine has a great deal to offer the back-to-work sector. The policies in place at the moment suggest the government is deliberately trying to whittle down the number of providers to a handful of very large, long-term providers and I don’t think it is going to leave the sector with enough diversity to meet the needs of all the individuals who find themselves unemployed.
“We’re in danger of producing a monoculture of support for the unemployed when what they need is a diversity of options.”
Red Kite Learning is now planning to hand back its contracts with London Councils and DWP, as well as its pre-existing contracts for local learning and employment work.
The decision to wind up was taken in May.
Jonathan Cohen
Managing Director
Third Sector Alliance
26 Jul 2012
Although I don't wish to duplicate some of the points already raised, this is another tragic example of the (negative) impact that the Work Programme has on well established charities with a proven track record of hitting targets and benefiting tens of thousands of people. The Governments initiative is frankly not sustainable for the long run, because they will be turning back to charities (similar to Red Kite Learning) for their support.
Bernadette Conlon
CEO
Start in Salford
25 Jul 2012
I just wanted to say how sad I am to hear that Red Kite Learning are being forced to take this decision due to the unrealistic ideas around Work programmes and employment of the most vulerable members of society. I run an arts and wellebing charity/social enterprise in Salford, Manchester and are dealing with the same issues and problems that Red Kite are facing although our main function is not employment this is something we do deal with. As usual most people do not realise or understand what is being rolled out in both the welfare sector and the NHS until it is to late and the damage is done.
Although I have not worked with Red Kite myself being in the 3rd sector I understand the hard work that goes on. I would like to thank Brendan and all his workers for all their hard work and committemnt over the years and hope that things will work out for all of you.
Bardro
25 Jul 2012
Very sad story indeed.
But - as an advocate of the devil - I have to highlight the fact that governemnt's contracts are not created to support he sector. They are designed to support as many people by as small cost as possible, partially because we (taxpayers) are paying for it.
Sad part is that charities do exist to offer very tailored support to users, very often this support is 'ineffective' in normel sense of this word as users come back againa and again for years so formally there's no imporvement whatsoever. But users do need this on-going support more than 'effective' one-off help. Tough call.
But then, charities are allowed and encouraged to solicit support from the society itself and I appreciate the level of exasperation of trustees who decide that their mission cannot be continued without goverment money. I don't think it's right - this way in few years time there shouldn't be even one charity and we all expect that the sector will in fact develop. An appeal to trustees: think before you close charity business due to government cuts - you are for people, not for government.
Mike Day
IT Trainer
Red Kite Learning
25 Jul 2012
I have worked in this sector for 19 years, including 3 sessions with Red Kite, the last lasting 10 years to the week. One may have got used to regular redundancies due to changes of government policies just as programmes became successful (Charity Action in 2001, Dependency 2 Work 2005) and another trendily named programme was launched by a new ministerial team, but this change is toxic and has been fatal to many small charities and community based businesses.
When the policy was announced (quietly) someone estimated 700 charities could go. I thought this was sensalitist reaction. Two years later my job, where I helped adults get work-related IT qualifications, hit my contract targets every year for 4 out of 5 years, is gone.
The Big Society? Only for big companies where the bosses get millons in pay.
Groundwork is sole charity prime on new £26m Neet programme
International aid charity closes
Music charity closes after loss of Arts Council funding
Work Programme charities fear contract failure as Miliband hints at Labour alternative
Commissioning practices are deterring social investment, says CAF
Homelessness charities subsidise Work Programme, says report
Acevo launches review of Work Programme
Cabinet Office to develop workshops on public service delivery for charities
Government departments are 'cooling' on payment-by-results, conference participants suggest
NCVO and Serco release code of practice for prime/sub relationship
Government to provide support to charities bidding for rehabilitation contracts
Scottish voluntary sector work programme 'a success'
Phillip Blond: charities are being exploited by primes on Work Programme
DWP refuses to release Work Programme risk register to Labour
23 May 2013
Unite members at Equinox Care have voted for two days of strike action over proposed pay cuts of up to...
23 May 2013
Big Society Network has finally filed its 2012 accounts with Companies House, nearly five months late,...
23 May 2013
There is a lack of financial capability on small charity trustee boards with many organisations leaving...
22 May 2013
Shadow minister for civil society Gareth Thomas has tabled a series of Parliamentary questions to minister...
22 May 2013
The trustees of the Jimmy Savile Charitable Trust are not donating any funds to the National Association...
22 May 2013
Charities’ membership or non-membership of the Fundraising Standards Board could be included on the...
22 May 2013
Google has shortlisted ten UK charities which stand the chance of winning £500,000 as part of its Global...
20 May 2013
Your CivilSociety rounds-up the most read stories from the previous week.
17 May 2013
The voluntary sector should create a “data manifesto” that identifies who holds data about the sector...

Attending our one day courses is a highly effective way of ensuring new and existing trustees fully understand their role, responsibilities and liabilities.
29 Oct 2013
29 Oct 2013
29 Oct 2013
27 Nov 2013
David Weatherhead
CEO
CMDA
26 Jul 2012
Unfortunately this is just the tip of the iceberg. Many charities rely on government contracts to support the other work they do. Over the last few years the government are awarding large contracts to big organisations who take a cut and pass it down. who then take a cut and pass it down. You get the picture?
Smaller charities cannot apply as the levels of the whole contract are to big. We have tried joint ventures but get nowhere.
At the end of the day the bulk of money is creamed off before it hits where its needed
[Reply]