Share

Amnesty's artistic call to action against Olympic procurement

Samar Jodha artist
News

Amnesty's artistic call to action against Olympic procurement

Governance | Kirsty Weakley | 23 Jul 2012

Amnesty International has used an art installation at its UK offices to call on the London Olympic Organising Committee to apologise for procuring goods from a company which is connected to an on-going legal dispute in India over a chemical leak.

The multi-sensory installation created by Indian artist Samar Jodha (pictured) recreates the Bhopal disaster of 1984, when toxic gas leaked from a pesticide factory in Bhopal killed between 7,000 and 10,000 people immediately. A further 15,000 people have died over the last 25 years, with the contaminated site "affecting the human rights of more than 100,000 people", according to Amnesty International.

Dow Chemical, which now owns the company responsible for the leak, is a global Olympic sponsor and also provided a fabric wrap for the Olympic Stadium.

Street artist, Pure Evil, has also painted a sign on Amnesty’s building in Shoreditch which says: “Don’t Poison our Olympics; Tell Lord Coe to stop defending Dow.” (Click on the thumbnail below to see).

Amnesty is calling on the public to contact Lord Coe, who is head of Locog, asking him to retract the committee’s defence of Dow and examine the procurement process that led to Dow being awarded the contract to provide the fabric wrap to the Stadium.

Peter Frankental, economic relations programme director at Amnesty International UK said: “Surely Locog should recommend that future Olympic hosts consider the human rights record of a sponsor, so that this sort of shameful association does not happen again. That would be a fitting legacy for the London Games.”

In a letter responding to Amnesty, Lord Coe said: “We do not dispute that there are issues outstanding in Bhopal particularly in relation to the remediation of the site, however as we understand it these outstanding issues are not the responsibility of Dow Chemical Company.”

Dow bought Union Carbide Corporation (UCC) in 2001, which at the time of the disaster had a 51 per cent share holding in Union Carbide India Limited (UCIL), which owned and ran the factory was responsible for the leak. UCC had sold its shares in UCIL in 1994.

Coe added that: “Having carefully looked into this issue and based everything we know and have seen from Dow, we stand behind them as a worldwide sponsor of the Olympic movement and as a supplier to Locog. We also stand by our procurement processes by which we award our contracts.”

 

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

Free eNews

Advice charities cutting back face-to-face services

19 Jun 2013

Leading advice services are being forced to cut back on face-to-face support and place more emphasis on...

Shadow minister: Big Society Network is coalition’s ‘favourite charity’

18 Jun 2013

The £500,000 allocated by the Cabinet Office to Big Society Network and Society Network Foundation since...

NCVO to look at ways of improving national media coverage of sector

18 Jun 2013

The National Council for Voluntary Organisations has commissioned a report to find ways to encourage the...

Advice charities cutting back face-to-face services

19 Jun 2013

Leading advice services are being forced to cut back on face-to-face support and place more emphasis on...

BIG announces £19m in community grants

18 Jun 2013

The Big Lottery Fund has announced 72 projects that have been allocated a share of £19m from its Reaching...

Fundraising self-regulation review announced

18 Jun 2013

The three fundraising regulatory bodies – the Institute of Fundraising, PFRA and Fundraising Standards...

Charities collaborate to increase private rented housing for disabled people

19 Jun 2013

The Housing and Support Alliance has teamed up with the co-founder of moneysupermarket.com and the Centre...

Advice charities cutting back face-to-face services

19 Jun 2013

Leading advice services are being forced to cut back on face-to-face support and place more emphasis on...

Commission to release data sets on charities' spending

17 Jun 2013

The Charity Commission data sets on how charities spend their money will be made publicly available in...

Join the discussion

Twitter
 
Training

Attending our one day courses is a highly effective way of ensuring new and existing trustees fully understand their role, responsibilities and liabilities.

>> Find out more <<