NHS backs down over transfer of services to social enterprise 2

Governance | Jonathan Last | 10 Feb 2012

The legal case against NHS Gloucestershire’s plans to transfer primary health services to a community interest company has been settled out of court, with the NHS promising to look again at the options.

Protests against the move were launched by 76-year-old Stroud resident Michael Lloyd last year and supported by local action groups including Stroud Against the Cuts. In January it was announced that the dispute would escalate to a legal hearing.

Solicitors for Lloyd contended that NHS Gloucestershire had acted unlawfully by not allowing proper consideration of other options – including those that would keep local health services in the NHS – since no competitive tendering process took place.

Rosa Curling of solicitors Leigh Day & Co. said: “NHS Gloucestershire had a number of options open to it, some of which would allow the community services in the area to remain provided by a NHS body. They failed to properly consider these options and their subsequent decision to award the contract to the social enterprise company is therefore unlawful.”

After the campaigners scored a win in Wednesday’s permissive hearing, the case was due to proceed to full judicial review yesterday in the High Court in London. But before this could begin, the NHS backed down and said it would reconsider the decision to outsource.

If the contract – thought to be worth around £100m a year for three years – had been awarded to Gloucestershire Care Services, it would have created the UK’s largest community interest company.

Members of Stroud Against the Cuts reacted positively to the result. James Beecher, chairman, said: "We are delighted that options for community health services in Gloucestershire to remain within the NHS are now back on the table.”

Caroline Molloy, a member of the group, added: "It will continue to be crucial for people to make their views known, and we will be organising a public meeting as soon as possible. We continue to collect signatures on our online petition. We would like to thank everyone who has supported us.”

Images

Place a comment

Albert West
Researcher
Wooden Wheel
10 Feb 2012

Transparency and democracy are in short supply at local government level in relation to new health scrutiny boards

[Reply]

Caroline
10 Feb 2012

We need to continue to work together to make sure the various NHS options available are now thoroughly pursued. Please sign our petition to keep these services within the NHS http://www.gopetition.com/petitions/keep-gloucestershire-s-nhs-public/sign.html

[Reply]

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Name *

Email *

Organisation

Job Title

Comments *

Verification *

* Please read our Community Standards

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

Robust but respectful debate
Strongly held opinions
Intelligent relevant discussion
The sharing of relevant experiences
New participants

We will not publish:

Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
The posting of contact details for yourself or others
Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.