Tribunal urged to review Commission decision on schools merger

Governance | Tania Mason | 19 Dec 2011

The Charity Tribunal has been asked to review a decision by the Charity Commission to allow two independent schools to merge.

Last month, the Commission published its decision agreeing to the merger of the Arnold School in Blackpool, which is run by the United Church Schools Trust, with the King Edward VII and Queen Mary School in nearby Lytham. The decision came in spite of around 100 objections from local campaigners calling themselves Friends of KEQMS Lytham.

The campaigners claimed that if the merger were to proceed, pupils with special learning needs would not be adequately catered for, and that the new arrangement would not require Christian education.

They said negotiations about the merger were conducted in secrecy and there was no consultation with pupils, parents or staff. They have billed the merger as a “takeover by the United Church Schools Trust”.

Friends of KEQMS Lytham are now raising funds to pursue the legal appeal, and said on a blog titled ‘An independent future’ that they had already raised around £7,000 of the £25,000 needed.

In its decision, the Commission said: “The test in this case is whether the property can be more effectively used in conjunction with other charitable property given for similar purposes.”

After considering the representations, including a briefing prepared by a parents group and further information supplied by the trustees to support their decision, the regulator concluded that the merger could go ahead.

The tribunal will decide whether to hear the appeal once it has received a response from the Charity Commission.

Directory: Charity Commission

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Name *

Email *

Organisation

Job Title

Comments *

Verification *

* Please read our Community Standards

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

Robust but respectful debate
Strongly held opinions
Intelligent relevant discussion
The sharing of relevant experiences
New participants

We will not publish:

Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
The posting of contact details for yourself or others
Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.