Schools case comes before Upper Tribunal again 2

Governance | Tania Mason | 2 Dec 2011

The Charity Commission and the Independent Schools Council recently returned to the Upper Tribunal after failing to agree how to amend the Commission’s public benefit guidance in the wake of the Tribunal’s initial judgment on the matter.

Although the Tribunal’s judgment concluded that parts of the guidance were wrong and must be changed, it did not state exactly how this should happen, leaving it to the two parties to agree the changes.

An attempt was made by the Commission and the ISC to try to come up with new wording that both sides were happy with, but agreement could not be reached. The ISC wants the existing guidance on public benefit for fee-charging charities to be immediately quashed, while the Commission merely thinks parts of it should just be rewritten. The Commission is in the process of devising new public benefit guidance anyway and says trustees should continue to use the existing guidance, incorporating some changes as required by the Tribunal, until the new guidance is ready.

Consequently, the ISC referred the matter back to the Upper Tribunal for a hearing which took place on 22 November. The Tribunal's decision is still pending.

A spokeswoman for the Commission said: “At the hearing we took the position that all that was required was for the Commission to be directed to bring the guidance into line with the judgment of the Tribunal, consulting on the revised guidance as appropriate. We also advised that we would make any immediately necessary amendments to the guidance on the Commission's website in the interim.”

The ISC's secretary general Matthew Burgess told civilsociety.co.uk that he had expected the Tribunal's decision by now: "We both went into the proceedings with our preferred form of court order and rather expected they would say 'ok it's that one or it's that one'.

"The fact they are taking time over it makes me think they are probably not going either with ours or the Charity Commission's, but with their own. And I think also they may be writing something which explains their reasoning for going with whatever they go with."

Click here to read former Charity Commission chief executive Andrew Hind’s verdict on the Upper Tribunal’s judgment.

Directory: Charity Commission

Place a comment

Stephen Lulsley
Independent Commentator and Consultant
2 Dec 2011

There is a simple but effective way to resolve this matter: remove charitable status from all fee-paying, profit making schools.

Such establishments should not be granted charitable status; they are businesses!

[Reply]

Anon
2 Dec 2011
Response to [Stephen Lulsley]

Dear Mr Lulsley

Please get off your repetitive hobby horse!

Yes they are businesses along with Universities, Care Homes, Museums, Operas, the National Trust - all of which charge fees for their services

Is your proposal that no "businesses" should be registered as charities?

[Reply]

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Name *

Email *

Organisation

Job Title

Comments *

Verification *

* Please read our Community Standards

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

Robust but respectful debate
Strongly held opinions
Intelligent relevant discussion
The sharing of relevant experiences
New participants

We will not publish:

Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
The posting of contact details for yourself or others
Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.