All charities urged to support at least one unemployed young person

Governance | Vibeka Mair | 1 Nov 2011

Stephen Lloyd, partner at law firm Bates Wells and Braithwaite, has called on all charities to help combat youth unemployment by supporting one or more NEET (not employed, in education or in training) young person.

Speaking at the NCVO Trustee Conference yesterday, Lloyd said charities in the future were facing a “period of historic change and a paradigm shift” for society:

“I don’t think the good times prior to 2006 are coming back,” he warned. “It will be a very difficult long-term period.

“Between 1976 and the 2000s Britain’s society was the most equal in history, now it is almost as unequal as in the 19th century. This is a huge problem especially for charities.”

Later in his speech, Lloyd referred to the worldwide Occupy movement which he said was looking to “make money matter less and values matter more”:

“We as a sector have around a million trustees and 220,000 charities. In the UK, one milion young people are NEET. It is now four times more difficult to get an apprenticeship at British Aerospace than to get into Cambridge."

Lloyd, who was also the architect of the Community Interest Company, said if every charity supported one or more NEETs they could help combat youth employment by taking them on as helpers, volunteers, interns or trustees.

His call was supported by Martha Lane Fox, founder of lastminute.com and the government’s digital champion, who spoke at the event on charities' digital engagement.

Fox said charities could utilise the skills of young people to bring digital skills into organisations.

“Use young people to help with technology in a tangible way,” she said.

Directory: Bates Wells & Braithwaite | National Council of Voluntary Organisations (NCVO)

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Name *

Email *

Organisation

Job Title

Comments *

Verification *

* Please read our Community Standards

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

Robust but respectful debate
Strongly held opinions
Intelligent relevant discussion
The sharing of relevant experiences
New participants

We will not publish:

Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
The posting of contact details for yourself or others
Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.