Lord Hodgson tells umbrella bodies to set up charity contract consortia 2

Governance | Vibeka Mair | 20 Oct 2011

Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbott, president of NCVO and chair of the Red Tape Task Force, has called on umbrella bodies, such as NCVO, Acevo and Navca, to set up and manage charity consortia which can bid for public sector contracts.

Lord Hodgson made the call yesterday at an All Party Parliamentary Group meeting on the Red Tape Task Force report Unschackling Good Neighbours.

The meeting, organised by NCVO, saw Lord Hodgson discuss with attendees the progress made since the release of the report, which aims to make it easier for charities to operate and grow.

A representative from Exeter CVS complained that public sector contracts were too often out of the league of small charities. He added that forming consortia was difficult as there was not enough time to develop successful partnerships when tendering time-scales were very short.

Lord Hodgson agreed that the problem of consortia hadn’t been cracked yet, and said common issues were a lack of personality and chemistry between organisations, and the issue of VAT.

He also said umbrella bodies could take more responsibility in this area:

“NCVO won’t like this,” he said, “but I do believe that the NCVOs, Acevos, and Navcas should act as godfathers and use their managerial skills to produce consortia. And also give guidelines on producing consortia.”

Talking about the progress made by the Red Tape Task Force, Lord Hodgson said traction had been made on insurance for volunteer drivers, with the Task Force successfully encouraging motor insurers to not charge premiums; and also on commissioning, with the end of pre-qualification questionnaires for all government contracts under £100,000.

But, he added, more was to be done, and said the Group would ask the voluntary sector next spring whether sufficient progress had been made.

At the meeting, a representative for the Institute for Fundraising (IoF) urged Lord Hodgson to work together with the IoF to promote its codes of practice, in response to complaints from Lord Hodgson that licensing laws and lottery laws were confusing for the public and charities.

“We’ve been trying to promote our codes, which cover raffles and licensing for years, but we can’t get them out,” said Sarah Tirrell, practice manager of policy and codes at the Institute. “ We’d like help in getting out the IoF message to local authorities and creating a standard."

Directory: Association of Chief Executives of Voluntary Organisations (ACEVO) | National Association for Voluntary and Community Action | National Council of Voluntary Organisations (NCVO)
Who's Who: Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts

Place a comment

Liz
26 Oct 2011

Consortia and partnerships is absolutely the right idea, but this misses the point. Consortia have to come together because they share a community of interest or way of working, not just because they are charities. You can't successfully build a consortia on what is in essence a governance structure.

[Reply]

Stolen
20 Oct 2011

The umbrella bodies provide a magnificent example of not working together, as Lord Hodgson is well aware, barring of course the very few magnificent in isolation instances with the rest being a hodge-podge.

And I am sure that small independent charities will not be in favour of falling under the the umbrella of the Godfather.

But my question is if there are very specific and actually few activities which suit the consortia model where small local charities are the players?

[Reply]

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Name *

Email *

Organisation

Job Title

Comments *

Verification *

* Please read our Community Standards

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

Robust but respectful debate
Strongly held opinions
Intelligent relevant discussion
The sharing of relevant experiences
New participants

We will not publish:

Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
The posting of contact details for yourself or others
Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.