Transition Fund should be extended for two years, says Curley 1

Governance | Gareth Jones | 3 Aug 2011

The Transition Fund must be extended for two more years, while local councils should each be forced to produce a ‘Big Society Plan’ to show how local charities will be protected, Navca chief executive Kevin Curley has argued.

Responding to yesterday’s report from campaigning group False Economy, Curley said it underestimates the scale of funding cuts, and argued that cuts in statutory funding of all types could be as high as £1.2bn this year.

He said the additional funding is necessary to support local advice, family support and youth services in our most disadvantaged communities, adding: “At the same time, local councils should be required to work with the local voluntary sector, the local NHS, further education and the police to produce a Big Society Plan for every upper tier area.

“This would need to show how support for local charities, community groups and volunteering will be sustained.”

He added: “Ever since the Urban Aid Programme of the late 60s every government has used its powers and resources to support the growth of local charities and community action, encouraging partnership work with all parts of the local state.

“Urgent action is needed now to protect the advances of the last 40 years from the worst consequences of rapid deficit reduction.”

Directory: National Association for Voluntary and Community Action
Who's Who: Kevin Curley

Place a comment

Graham Lawrence
4 Aug 2011

I think that the plight of homelessness charities should also have been on the agenda here. Homeless people are some of society's most vulnerable and appear to have been the first and worst to suffer.

[Reply]

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Name *

Email *

Organisation

Job Title

Comments *

Verification *

* Please read our Community Standards

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

Robust but respectful debate
Strongly held opinions
Intelligent relevant discussion
The sharing of relevant experiences
New participants

We will not publish:

Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
The posting of contact details for yourself or others
Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.