Share

From fundraising to resource-raising

Caroline Beaumont, Clore Social Fellow
Finance

From fundraising to resource-raising

Governance | Caroline Beaumont | 12 Jul 2011

Charities could unlock untapped resources if they were more strategic about non-cash giving, says Caroline Beaumont.       
            
The central idea of my new report, From Fundraising to Resource-Raising, is that donated resources, including goods, services and facilities, knowledge, skills, profile, access and influence, can make a valid and valuable contribution to income generation and mission delivery. 

One of the people I interviewed for the research was Lindsay Boswell, former CEO of the Institute of Fundraising and now chief executive at FareShare, which features as a case study in the report.  Lindsay commented: “When there isn't much money around then fundraisers have got to be lighter on their feet, cleverer and looking at what other resources are available to them beyond pure dosh.”

However, two-thirds of charity professionals I surveyed described their approach as reactive or opportunistic. In the face of falling funding and increasing demand from donors to give more than money, the study suggests that the time is right for a more planned approach and that charities need to better support fundraisers to raise more than money.

There is particular attention to the importance of valuing and reporting on non-cash giving. Two-thirds of survey respondents weren’t able to easily find out the value of donated resources to their organisation and 72 per cent said their charity never counts the income towards the fundraising target. There is a direct correlation between how supportive a charity’s financial systems are and how good the charity is at resource-raising. Those that value and report send a message that they are strategically important and those that count the equivalent income towards fundraising targets and set more rounded fundraising performance measures, which also consider impact on mission, drive more entrepreneurial behaviour. There is a recognition that the Charities SORP’s guidance on valuing donated resources is open to interpretation and David Membrey, deputy chief executive of Charity Finance Directors’ Group, contributed new guidance on the subject to the report.

Membrey makes his own arguments for reporting the value:  “It all comes down to transparency, not just in terms of your stakeholders’ understanding but your organisation understanding itself. So often charities don’t really understand their costs because so much slips through as ‘in kind’ in one way or another,” he said.

Membrey went on: “As a funder, I think you would worry that, if you’re not reporting donated resources then what else aren’t you being clear about? If people can tell it reduces the general confidence and not valuing them means you’re completely disregarding that particular group of donors.” 

Other factors that influence a charity’s ability to resource-raise effectively include:

  • the strategic clarity to proactively identify resourceful ways to deliver the mission
  • the ability of programmes, services, operations, procurement and finance people to work together to identify needs, specifications and value
  • upfront acknowledgement of the costs associated with managing and mobilising the resource
  • recognition of the different and distinctive skills needed by resource-raisers
  • confidence in negotiating with the donor for quality, reliability and sustainability

The report features seven case studies highlighting good practice from the likes of Crisis, Christian Aid and Leonard Cheshire Disability and includes practical guidance on how to develop a resource-raising strategy. It is available as a free download from the Clore Social Leadership Programme website.

Caroline Beaumont is a 2010 Clore Social Fellow and director of services and business development at Reach Volunteering

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

Catholic Care is not the only fruit

21 May 2012

While the Catholic Care case captured all the headlines, the Equality Act exemptions also have other implications,...

Charities and subsidiary trading companies

21 May 2012

Thinking of setting up a trading arm? Malcolm Lynch navigates the potential pitfalls.

Challenging legacies - the pros and cons

21 May 2012

Mark Keenan explores the implications of the case of RSPCA v Gill on charity finance litigation.

Meet the funders: Esmée Fairbairn

25 May 2012

The Esmée Fairbairn Foundation gives away £30m each year in grants. John Mulligan talks to Adam Martin....

Facebook in figures

9 May 2012

Facebook has been going from strength to strength. Fundraising magazine took  closer look at the...

Meet the funders: Deloitte

9 May 2012

Deloitte is generous with its time and money. It needs to know both are helping a charity’s strategic...

Seven top tips for online success

23 Mar 2012

To help charities and social enterprises develop a solid online presence, Darren Langham and Matt Tullett...

CRUK new app will enable donations

22 Feb 2012

Cancer Research UK has announced that it is developing a new smartphone app that will provide more services,...

Legal changes ahead for Scottish charity websites

8 Feb 2012

New regulations which will affect all Scottish charity websites have been tabled in the Scottish Parliament...

emailalert

Join the discussion

Twitter
 
Training

Attending our one day courses is a highly effective way of ensuring new and existing trustees fully understand their role, responsibilities and liabilities.

>> Find out more <<